Quantifying the influence of microstructure on effective conductivity and permeability: Virtual materials testing

Effective conductivity and permeability of a versatile, graph-based model of random structures are investigated numerically. This model, originally introduced in Gaiselmann et al. (2014) allows one to simulate a wide class of realistic materials. In the present work, an extensive dataset of two-phas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of solids and structures Vol. 184; pp. 211 - 220
Main Authors Neumann, Matthias, Stenzel, Ole, Willot, François, Holzer, Lorenz, Schmidt, Volker
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2020
Elsevier BV
Elsevier
SeriesSpecial Issue on Physics and Mechanics of Random Structures: From Morphology to Material Properties
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Effective conductivity and permeability of a versatile, graph-based model of random structures are investigated numerically. This model, originally introduced in Gaiselmann et al. (2014) allows one to simulate a wide class of realistic materials. In the present work, an extensive dataset of two-phase microstructures with wide-ranging morphological features is used to assess the relationship between microstructure and effective transport properties, which are computed using Fourier-based methods on digital images. Our main morphological descriptors are phase volume fractions, mean geodesic tortuosity, two “hydraulic radii” for characterizing the length scales of heterogeneities, and a “constrictivity” parameter that describes bottleneck effects. This additional parameter, usually not considered in homogenization theories, is an essential ingredient for predicting transport properties, as observed in Gaiselmann et al. (2014). We modify the formula originally developed in Stenzel et al. (2016) for predicting the effective conductivity and propose a formula for permeability. For the latter one, different geometrical definitions of the hydraulic radius are compared. Our predictions are validated using tomographic image data of fuel cells.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0020-7683
1879-2146
DOI:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.03.028