Association between right ventricular systolic function and electromechanical delay in patients with right bundle branch block

Abstract Background Elevated right ventricle (RV) pressure and/or volume can place stress on the right bundle branch block (RBBB) and its associated Purkinje network, which can affect its electrical properties, resulting in conduction delay or block. We hypothesized that prolonged R′ wave duration i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cardiology Vol. 70; no. 5; pp. 470 - 475
Main Authors Park, Dong Hyun, MD, Cho, Kyoung Im, MD, PhD, Kim, Yoon Kyung, MD, Kim, Bong Joon, MD, You, Ga In, MD, Im, Sung Il, MD, Kim, Hyun Su, MD, Heo, Jeong Ho, MD, PhD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background Elevated right ventricle (RV) pressure and/or volume can place stress on the right bundle branch block (RBBB) and its associated Purkinje network, which can affect its electrical properties, resulting in conduction delay or block. We hypothesized that prolonged R′ wave duration in lead V1 would extend the later portion of the QRS complex and can act as an indicator of reduced RV function in patients with RBBB. Method Kosin University Gospel Hospital echocardiography and electrocardiography (ECG) database was reviewed to identify patients with complete RBBB between 2013 and 2015. ECGs recorded closest to the time of the echocardiography were carefully reviewed, and QRS and R′ wave duration were measured. RV systolic dysfunction was defined as an RV fractional area change (FAC) less than 35%, as indicated by echocardiography guidelines. Results Compared to patients with normal RV function ( n = 241), patients with RV dysfunction ( n = 123) showed prolonged QRS duration (145.3 ± 19.3 ms vs. 132.2 ± 13.4 ms, p < 0.001), predominantly due to R′ prolongation (84.8 ± 13.0 ms vs. 102.9 ± 12.0 ms, p < 0.001). R′ duration was significantly associated with RV FAC ( r = −0.609, p < 0.001), RV systolic pressure ( r = 0.142, p = 0.008), RV dimension ( r = 0.193, p < 0.001), and RV myocardial performance index ( r = 0.199, p < 0.001). On receiving operator characteristic curve analysis, V1 R′ duration ≥93 ms was associated with RV dysfunction with 90% sensitivity and 87% specificity (area under the curve: 0.883, 95% confidence interval = 0.845–0.914, p < 0.001). Conclusion Prolonged R′ wave duration in lead V1 is an indicator of RV dysfunction and pressure and/or volume overload in patients with RBBB.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0914-5087
1876-4738
DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.01.004