Effect of mini-implant diameter on fracture risk and self-drilling efficacy

Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of mini-implant diameter on fracture risk and self-drilling efficacy. Methods A sample of 405 mini-implants with 9 diameters from 1.2 to 2.0 mm was used. Ten mini-implants of each diameter were placed in artificial bone, and 25 were place...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics Vol. 140; no. 4; pp. e181 - e192
Main Authors Barros, Sérgio Estelita, Janson, Guilherme, Chiqueto, Kelly, Garib, Daniela Gamba, Janson, Marcos
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Mosby, Inc 01.10.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of mini-implant diameter on fracture risk and self-drilling efficacy. Methods A sample of 405 mini-implants with 9 diameters from 1.2 to 2.0 mm was used. Ten mini-implants of each diameter were placed in artificial bone, and 25 were placed in pig iliac bone to evaluate placement torque (PT) and axial placement load (APL), which represents self-drilling efficacy. Ten mini-implants of each diameter were used to determine fracture torque (FT). The different diameters were compared regarding PT, FT, and APL. The fracture risk of each diameter was evaluated by the fracture resistance index (FT/PT × [FT-PT]). The PT and APL changes during placement were correlated. Results Only PT and FT were different for all mini-implant diameter changes. PT and FT showed a strong correlation with the mini-implant diameter, but the APL was weakly to moderately correlated. The fracture resistance index was remarkably greater for each 0.1 mm added in diameter. The PT increased significantly, whereas the APL was progressively reduced during placement. Conclusions Increases in mini-implant diameters significantly influenced the increases of PT and FT on quantities that progressively reduced the fracture risk. The self-drilling efficacy was not strongly influenced by diameter.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0889-5406
1097-6752
DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.016