Differences in the Nonword Repetition Performance of Children With and Without Specific Language Impairment: A Meta-Analysis

Julia L. Evans San Diego State University, San Diego, CA Nicole M. Else-Quest University of Wisconsin—Madison Contact author: Katharine Graf Estes, Department of Psychology, Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1500 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705-2280. E-mail: kmgraf{at}wisc.edu . Pu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of speech, language, and hearing research Vol. 50; no. 1; pp. 177 - 195
Main Authors Graf Estes, Katharine, Evans, Julia L, Else-Quest, Nicole M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States ASHA 01.02.2007
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Julia L. Evans San Diego State University, San Diego, CA Nicole M. Else-Quest University of Wisconsin—Madison Contact author: Katharine Graf Estes, Department of Psychology, Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1500 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705-2280. E-mail: kmgraf{at}wisc.edu . Purpose: This study presents a meta-analysis of the difference in nonword repetition performance between children with and without specific language impairment (SLI). The authors investigated variability in the effect sizes (i.e., the magnitude of the difference between children with and without SLI) across studies and its relation to several factors: type of nonword repetition task, age of SLI sample, and nonword length. Method: The authors searched computerized databases and reference sections and requested unpublished data to find reports of nonword repetition tasks comparing children with and without SLI. Results: Children with SLI exhibited very large impairments in nonword repetition, performing an average (across 23 studies) of 1.27 standard deviations below children without SLI. A moderator analysis revealed that different versions of the nonword repetition task yielded significantly different effect sizes, indicating that the measures are not interchangeable. The second moderator analysis found no association between effect size and the age of children with SLI. Finally, an exploratory meta-analysis found that children with SLI displayed difficulty repeating even short nonwords, with greater difficulty for long nonwords. Conclusions: These findings have potential to affect how nonword repetition tasks are used and interpreted, and suggest several directions for future research. KEY WORDS: memory, meta-analysis, selective language impairment CiteULike     Connotea     Del.icio.us     Digg     Facebook     Reddit     Technorati     Twitter     What's this?
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1092-4388
1558-9102
DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/015)