Utility of Helicobacter spp. associated GFD markers for detecting avian fecal pollution in natural waters of two continents

Avian fecal droppings may negatively impact environmental water quality due to the presence of high concentrations of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) and zoonotic pathogens. This study was aimed at evaluating the performance characteristics and utility of a Helicobacter spp. associated GFD marker by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWater research (Oxford) Vol. 88; pp. 613 - 622
Main Authors Ahmed, W., Harwood, V.J., Nguyen, K., Young, S., Hamilton, K., Toze, S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Avian fecal droppings may negatively impact environmental water quality due to the presence of high concentrations of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) and zoonotic pathogens. This study was aimed at evaluating the performance characteristics and utility of a Helicobacter spp. associated GFD marker by screening 265 fecal and wastewater samples from a range of avian and non-avian host groups from two continents (Brisbane, Australia and Florida, USA). The host-prevalence and -specificity of this marker among fecal and wastewater samples tested from Brisbane were 0.58 and 0.94 (maximum value of 1.00). These values for the Florida fecal samples were 0.30 (host-prevalence) and 1.00 (host-specificity). The concentrations of the GFD markers in avian and non-avian fecal nucleic acid samples were measured at a test concentration of 10 ng of nucleic acid at Brisbane and Florida laboratories using the quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay. The mean concentrations of the GFD marker in avian fecal nucleic acid samples (5.2 × 103 gene copies) were two orders of magnitude higher than non-avian fecal nucleic acid samples (8.6 × 101 gene copies). The utility of this marker was evaluated by testing water samples from the Brisbane River, Brisbane and a freshwater creek in Florida. Among the 18 water samples tested from the Brisbane River, 83% (n = 18) were positive for the GFD marker, and the concentrations ranged from 6.0 × 101–3.2 × 102 gene copies per 100 mL water. In all, 92% (n = 25) water samples from the freshwater creek in Florida were also positive for the GFD marker with concentrations ranging from 2.8 × 101–1.3 × 104 gene copies per 100 mL water. Based on the results, it can be concluded that the GFD marker is highly specific to avian host groups, and could be used as a reliable marker to detect the presence and amount of avian fecal pollution in environmental waters. •Performance characteristics of Helicobacter spp. GFD marker were evaluated.•The sensitivity of the GFD marker among fecal and wastewater samples were >0.30.•The specificity of the GFD marker among fecal and wastewater samples were >0.90.•83–92% water samples were positive for the GFD marker.•GFD could be used as a reliable marker to detect avian fecal pollution in water.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0043-1354
1879-2448
DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2015.10.050