Vitamin A and risk of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis

Abstract Objective To conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies assessing the association of vitamin A (retinol, carotene and other carotenoids) intake or blood (serum or plasma) levels of vitamin A (retinol and carotene) with risk of cervical cancer. Methods We evaluated the studies...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGynecologic oncology Vol. 124; no. 2; pp. 366 - 373
Main Authors Zhang, Xingliang, Dai, Bingqin, Zhang, Bingzhen, Wang, Zhiping
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.02.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Objective To conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies assessing the association of vitamin A (retinol, carotene and other carotenoids) intake or blood (serum or plasma) levels of vitamin A (retinol and carotene) with risk of cervical cancer. Methods We evaluated the studies published in English and Chinese on diet or blood vitamin A for the risk of cervical cancer. We also reviewed reference lists from retrieved articles. Meta-analysis was applied to calculate the combined effect values and their 95% confidence intervals. The risk of bias was assessed by the Egger regression asymmetry test. Results As many as 11 articles on dietary vitamin A and 4 articles on blood vitamin A were selected according to the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis, for a total of 12,136 participants. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) of cervical cancer were 0.59 (95% CI, 0.49–0.72) for total vitamin A intake and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.41–0.89) for blood vitamin A levels. The combined ORs of cervical cancer were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.64–1.00), 0.51 (95% CI, 0.35–0.73) and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.43–0.84) for retinol, carotene and other carotenoid intake, and 1.14 (95% CI, 0.83–1.56) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.30–0.77) for blood retinol and carotene. Conclusions Vitamin A intake and blood vitamin A levels were inversely associated with the risk of cervical cancer in this meta-analysis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0090-8258
1095-6859
DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.10.012