Developing a list of reference chemicals for testing alternatives to whole fish toxicity tests

This paper details the derivation of a list of 60 reference chemicals for the development of alternatives to animal testing in ecotoxicology with a particular focus on fish. The chemicals were selected as a prerequisite to gather mechanistic information on the performance of alternative testing syst...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAquatic toxicology Vol. 90; no. 2; pp. 128 - 137
Main Authors Schirmer, Kristin, Tanneberger, Katrin, Kramer, Nynke I., Völker, Doris, Scholz, Stefan, Hafner, Christoph, Lee, Lucy E.J., Bols, Niels C., Hermens, Joop L.M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 11.11.2008
Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier Science
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper details the derivation of a list of 60 reference chemicals for the development of alternatives to animal testing in ecotoxicology with a particular focus on fish. The chemicals were selected as a prerequisite to gather mechanistic information on the performance of alternative testing systems, namely vertebrate cell lines and fish embryos, in comparison to the fish acute lethality test. To avoid the need for additional experiments with fish, the U.S. EPA fathead minnow database was consulted as reference for whole organism responses. This database was compared to the Halle Registry of Cytotoxicity and a collation of data by the German EPA (UBA) on acute toxicity data derived from zebrafish embryos. Chemicals that were present in the fathead minnow database and in at least one of the other two databases were subject to selection. Criteria included the coverage of a wide range of toxicity and physico-chemical parameters as well as the determination of outliers of the in vivo/ in vitro correlations. While the reference list of chemicals now guides our research for improving cell line and fish embryo assays to make them widely applicable, the list could be of benefit to search for alternatives in ecotoxicology in general. One example would be the use of this list to validate structure–activity prediction models, which in turn would benefit from a continuous extension of this list with regard to physico-chemical and toxicological data.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2008.08.005
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0166-445X
1879-1514
DOI:10.1016/j.aquatox.2008.08.005