Imaging performance in guiding response to neoadjuvant therapy according to breast cancer subtypes: A systematic literature review

Highlights • 15 observational studies examined imaging performance for measuring response during NAC. • Evidence to conclude on the preferred imaging technique per BC subtype is lacking. •18 FDG-PET/CT seems to be preferred in ER-negative/HER2positive BC over MRI. • MRI and18 FDG-PET/CT are promisin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCritical reviews in oncology/hematology Vol. 112; pp. 198 - 207
Main Authors Lindenberg, Melanie A, Miquel-Cases, Anna, Retèl, Valesca P, Sonke, Gabe S, Wesseling, Jelle, Stokkel, Marcel P.M, van Harten, Wim H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.04.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Highlights • 15 observational studies examined imaging performance for measuring response during NAC. • Evidence to conclude on the preferred imaging technique per BC subtype is lacking. •18 FDG-PET/CT seems to be preferred in ER-negative/HER2positive BC over MRI. • MRI and18 FDG-PET/CT are promising in both triple negative and HER2-positive BC. • Consensus should be reached on: interval time, cut-off values, and pCR definitions.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Undefined-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-2
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:1040-8428
1879-0461
DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.02.014