Productivity as related to diversity and age in planted versus natural forests

AIM: Little is known about the performance of plantations relative to natural forests of the same climate zone and age. China has more plantations than any other country as a consequence of massive afforestation efforts. We use data from China to comparatively examine tree biomass and productivity o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGlobal ecology and biogeography Vol. 23; no. 12; pp. 1461 - 1471
Main Authors Guo, Qinfeng, Ren, Hai
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Science 01.12.2014
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:AIM: Little is known about the performance of plantations relative to natural forests of the same climate zone and age. China has more plantations than any other country as a consequence of massive afforestation efforts. We use data from China to comparatively examine tree biomass and productivity of planted and natural stands in relation to climate zone, latitude, elevation, age and species diversity (richness). LOCATION: Six forest climate/vegetation zones in China. METHODS: We used a database completed in 2007 and then updated in 2013 that contained extensive records of forest stands (10 m × 10 m plots) across China. The database records included a total of 6153 forest stands (1716 planted forests aged 0–80 years and 4437 natural forests of aged 0–400 years), located from 18.1 to 53.2° N and 75.53 to 131.8° E, and between elevations of 7 and 4240 m above sea level. These forests were grouped into six climate zones for comparisons. RESULTS: Under generally similar physical conditions (climate zones) to those in natural forests and despite having low diversity (i.e. often a single tree species), plantations aged 0–80 years already had similar biomass but much higher productivity, and thus much higher carbon sequestration rates, than natural forests. Tree biomass, productivity and their above/below ground ratios showed stronger latitudinal and elevational trends in natural forests than in planted forests. No difference in productivity was observed between the planted forests with one or two species; in natural forests, however, high diversity usually led to high productivity. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: The differences in performance between planted and natural forests were mainly explained by: (1) age (the plantations were in early succession), (2) elevation (plantations were located at lower elevations), and (3) species selection (only highly productive species were planted). As the plantations were all still young, closer monitoring of their performance is needed.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geb.12238
istex:1896AB8D4CDA658B67C8CE7B6DFB44B2D802C41A
Figure S1 Distribution of forest types and sampling plots across China. Figure S2 Shoot/root ratios of planted and natural forests. Figure S3 Allometric relationships in planted and natural forests in China. Figure S4 Relationship between biomass and tree density. Figure S5 Results from principal component analysis (PCA). Figure S6 Relationship between latitude and elevation of forests in China. Figure S7 Relationships between tree size (height) and productivity. Table S1 Climate/vegetation zones in China. Appendix S1 Additional references on biomass and productivity measurements. Appendix S2 Data used in this study (with updates).
ark:/67375/WNG-MFXQQFFT-2
ArticleID:GEB12238
'Strategic Priority Research Program' of the Chinese Academy of Sciences - No. XDA05050206
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1466-822X
1466-8238
DOI:10.1111/geb.12238