Cardiac Electrophysiological Substrate Underlying the ECG Phenotype and Electrogram Abnormalities in Brugada Syndrome Patients

• Published in: Circulation (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 131; no. 22; pp. 1950 - 1959
• Main Authors: Zhang, Junjie, Sacher, Frédéric, Hoffmayer, Kurt, O’Hara, Thomas, Strom, Maria, Cuculich, Phillip, Silva, Jennifer, Cooper, Daniel, Faddis, Mitchell, Hocini, Mélèze, Haïssaguerre, Michel, Scheinman, Melvin, Rudy, Yoram
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc 02.06.2015
• Subjects: Arrhythmias, Cardiac - diagnosis; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - genetics; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology; Brugada Syndrome - diagnosis; Brugada Syndrome - genetics; Brugada Syndrome - physiopathology; Cardiac Conduction System Disease; Electrocardiography - methods; Female; Heart Conduction System - abnormalities; Heart Conduction System - physiopathology; Humans; Male; Phenotype; Brugada syndrome; electrophysiology; electrocardiography
• ISSN: 0009-7322; 1524-4539; 1524-4539
• DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013698

BACKGROUND—Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a highly arrhythmogenic cardiac disorder, associated with an increased incidence of sudden death. Its arrhythmogenic substrate in the intact human heart remains ill-defined. METHODS AND RESULTS—Using noninvasive ECG imaging, we studied 25 BrS patients to characterize the electrophysiological substrate and 6 patients with right bundle-branch block for comparison. Seven healthy subjects provided control data. Abnormal substrate was observed exclusively in the right ventricular outflow tract with the following properties (in comparison with healthy controls; P<0.005)(1) ST-segment elevation and inverted T wave of unipolar electrograms (2.21±0.67 versus 0 mV); (2) delayed right ventricular outflow tract activation (82±18 versus 37±11 ms); (3) low-amplitude (0.47±0.16 versus 3.74±1.60 mV) and fractionated electrograms, suggesting slow discontinuous conduction; (4) prolonged recovery time (381±30 versus 311±34 ms) and activation-recovery intervals (318±32 versus 241±27 ms), indicating delayed repolarization; (5) steep repolarization gradients (Δrecovery time/Δx=96±28 versus 7±6 ms/cm, Δactivation-recovery interval/Δx=105±24 versus 7±5 ms/cm) at right ventricular outflow tract borders. With increased heart rate in 6 BrS patients, reduced ST-segment elevation and increased fractionation were observed. Unlike BrS, right bundle-branch block had delayed activation in the entire right ventricle, without ST-segment elevation, fractionation, or repolarization abnormalities on electrograms. CONCLUSIONS—The results indicate that both slow discontinuous conduction and steep dispersion of repolarization are present in the right ventricular outflow tract of BrS patients. ECG imaging could differentiate between BrS and right bundle-branch block.