Pelvic exenteration: Ten-year experience at the European Institute of Oncology in Milan

Abstract Objectives Analyze morbidity and survival after pelvic exenteration (PE) of gynecological malignancies. Methods We reviewed 106 consecutive patients with gynecologic malignancies who underwent PE from June 1996 to April 2007 at the Division of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGynecologic oncology Vol. 114; no. 1; pp. 64 - 68
Main Authors Maggioni, Angelo, Roviglione, Giovanni, Landoni, Fabio, Zanagnolo, Vanna, Peiretti, Michele, Colombo, Nicoletta, Bocciolone, Luca, Biffi, Roberto, Minig, Lucas, Morrow, C. Paul
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Objectives Analyze morbidity and survival after pelvic exenteration (PE) of gynecological malignancies. Methods We reviewed 106 consecutive patients with gynecologic malignancies who underwent PE from June 1996 to April 2007 at the Division of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan. Results PE was performed for cancer of the cervix (62 patients), vagina (21 patients), vulva (9 patients), endometrium (9 patients), ovary (4 patients) and 1 uterine sarcoma. Mean age was 53.6 (30–78) years. 97% of the patients received radiotherapy before PE and 3 patients had PE as primary treatment. We performed 53 anterior, 48 total and 5 posterior PE. Median operation time, estimated blood loss and hospital stay were respectively 490 (200–780) minutes, 1240 (300–6500) ml and 21.6 (11–55) days. No residual tumor was left in 93% of the patients. Median follow-up was 22.3 (1.6–117) months. There were no post-operative deaths (< 30 days from surgery) nor intra-operative mortality. Total morbidity rate was 66%; 48% of patients had early complications (< 30 days after PE) whereas 52 patients (48.5%) had late complications; 70% of these occurred to the urinary tract and 25% were due to bowel occlusions or fistulas. Overall survival was 52%, 35%, 19% and 16% respectively for cervical, endometrial, vaginal and vulvar cancer. Conclusions PE is a feasible technique with no post-operative mortality and high percentage of long-survivors, although the morbidity rate still remains significantly high. Careful patient selection, pre- and post-operative care and optimal surgical skills in a Gynecologic Oncologic Center are the cornerstones to further improve quality of life and survival for these patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0090-8258
1095-6859
DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.03.029