The role of muscle mass in exercise-induced hyperemia

• Published in: Journal of applied physiology (1985) Vol. 116; no. 9; pp. 1204 - 1209
• Main Authors: Garten, Ryan S., Groot, H. Jonathan, Rossman, Matthew J., Gifford, Jayson R., Richardson, Russell S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Physiological Society 01.05.2014
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Blood; Blood Flow Velocity - physiology; Coefficient of variation; Correlation analysis; Exercise; Exercise - physiology; Humans; Hyperemia - etiology; Hyperemia - physiopathology; Knee; Leg - blood supply; Leg - physiology; Male; Muscular system; Oxygen Consumption - physiology; Physical Exertion - physiology; Quadriceps Muscle - blood supply; Quadriceps Muscle - physiology; Regional Blood Flow - physiology; Young Adult; muscle mass; normalization; blood flow; knee extension
• ISSN: 8750-7587; 1522-1601; 1522-1601
• DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00103.2014

Exercise-induced hyperemia is often normalized for muscle mass, and this value is sometimes evaluated at relative exercise intensities to take muscle recruitment into account. Therefore, this study sought to better understand the impact of muscle mass on leg blood flow (LBF) during exercise. LBF was assessed by Doppler ultrasound in 27 young healthy male subjects performing knee-extensor (KE) exercise at three absolute (5, 15, and 25 W) and three relative [20, 40, and 60% of maximum KE (KE max )] workloads. Thigh muscle mass (5.2–8.1 kg) and LBF were significantly correlated at rest ( r = 0.54; P = 0.004). Exercise-induced hyperemia was linearly related to absolute workload, but revealed substantial between-subject variability, documented by the coefficient of variation (5 W: 17%; 15 W: 16%; 25 W: 16%). Quadriceps muscle mass (1.5–2.7 kg) and LBF were not correlated at 5, 15, or 25 W ( r = 0.09–0.01; P = 0.7–0.9). Normalizing blood flow for quadriceps muscle mass did not improve the coefficient of variation at each absolute workload (5 W: 21%; 15 W: 21%; 25 W: 22%), while the additional evaluation at relative exercise intensities resulted in even greater variance (20% KE max : 29%; 40% KE max : 29%; 60% KE max : 27%). Similar findings were documented when subjects were parsed into high and low aerobic capacity. Thus, in contrast to rest, blood flow during exercise is unrelated to muscle mass, and simply normalizing for muscle mass or comparing normalized blood flow at a given relative exercise intensity has no effect on the inherent blood flow variability. Therefore, during exercise, muscle mass does not appear to be a determinant of the hyperemic response.