Predictive value of NT-proBNP for 30-day mortality in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a comparison with the GRACE and TIMI risk scores

The biomarker N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) predicts outcome in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). Whether NT-proBNP has incremental prognostic value beyond established risk strategies is still questionable. To evaluate the predictive value of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inVascular health and risk management Vol. 12; pp. 471 - 476
Main Authors Schellings, Dirk Aam, Adiyaman, Ahmet, Dambrink, Jan-Henk E, Gosselink, At Marcel, Kedhi, Elvin, Roolvink, Vincent, Ottervanger, Jan Paul, Van't Hof, Arnoud Wj
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New Zealand Taylor & Francis Ltd 01.01.2016
Dove Medical Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The biomarker N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) predicts outcome in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). Whether NT-proBNP has incremental prognostic value beyond established risk strategies is still questionable. To evaluate the predictive value of NT-proBNP for 30-day mortality over and beyond the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk scores in patients with NSTE-ACS. Patients included in our ACS registry were candidates. NT-proBNP levels on admission were measured and the GRACE and TIMI risk scores were assessed. We compared the predictive value of NT-proBNP to both risk scores and evaluated whether NT-proBNP improves prognostication by using receiver operator curves and measures of discrimination improvement. A total of 1324 patients were included and 50 patients died during follow-up. On logistic regression analysis NT-proBNP and the GRACE risk score (but not the TIMI risk score) both independently predicted mortality at 30 days. The predictive value of NT-proBNP did not differ significantly compared to the GRACE risk score (area under the curve [AUC]) 0.85 vs 0.87 =0.67) but was considerably higher in comparison to the TIMI risk score (AUC 0.60 <0.001). Adjustment of the GRACE risk score by adding NT-proBNP did not improve prognostication: AUC 0.86 ( =0.57), integrated discrimination improvement 0.04 ( =0.003), net reclassification improvement 0.12 ( =0.21). In patients with NSTE-ACS, NT-proBNP and the GRACE risk score (but not the TIMI risk score) both have good and comparable predictive value for 30-day mortality. However, incremental prognostic value of NT-proBNP beyond the GRACE risk score could not be demonstrated.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1178-2048
1176-6344
1178-2048
DOI:10.2147/VHRM.S117204