Cardiac Adaptation in Acute Hypertensive Pulmonary Edema

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (global and regional, systolic and diastolic) acute dyssynchrony, ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR), and afterload changes in acute hypertensive pulmonary edema (AHPE). Forty-four consecutive patients were evaluated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of cardiology Vol. 109; no. 10; pp. 1472 - 1481
Main Authors Mǎrgulescu, Andrei D., MD, Rimbaş, Roxana C., MD, Florescu, Maria, MD, Dulgheru, Raluca E., MD, Cintezǎ, Mircea, MD, PhD, Vinereanu, Dragoş, MD, PhD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 15.05.2012
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (global and regional, systolic and diastolic) acute dyssynchrony, ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR), and afterload changes in acute hypertensive pulmonary edema (AHPE). Forty-four consecutive patients were evaluated by comprehensive echocardiography during clinical and radiologic pulmonary edema (63 ± 29 minutes after first dose of treatment) and after 48 to 92 hours. Twenty age- and gender-matched asymptomatic hypertensive and diabetic subjects served as controls. AHPE was associated with increased afterload (estimated arterial elastance 3.0 vs 2.3 mm Hg/ml, p = 0.024) and subsequent decreased longitudinal LV systolic function (mean strain of 6 basal segments −11.0% vs −15.4%; p = 0.015) compared to the stable follow-up state. However, global LV systolic function was maintained (estimated ventricular elastance 1.7 vs 1.6 mm Hg/ml, stroke work 76.7 vs 84.5 cJ, ejection fraction 0.33 vs 0.37, all nonsignificant). Except for diastolic filling time (ratio to cardiac cycle 0.41 vs 0.49, p <0.001), other indexes of diastolic function, dyssynchrony, and MR severity were similar between evaluations. Patients with AHPE had worse ventricular–arterial coupling, systolic function, estimated diastolic stiffness, and filling pressures compared to asymptomatic controls, suggesting a decreased capacity to adapt to changes in loading. In conclusion, acute alterations of systolic and diastolic LV function, myocardial synchrony, and ischemic MR are unlikely mechanisms of AHPE. Rather, AHPE is likely to develop in patients with decreased systolic and diastolic capacity to adapt to acute changes in loading.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.01.359