Public awareness, behaviours and attitudes towards domestic wastewater treatment systems in the Republic of Ireland

• Published in: Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) Vol. 518; pp. 108 - 119
• Main Authors: Naughton, O., Hynds, P.D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.10.2014
• Subjects: Behavioural; Contaminants; Contamination; Domestic; Domestic wastewater treatment; Human; Pollution sources; Public health; Socio-hydrology; Strategy; Wastewater treatment; Water management; Eire; Domestic wastewater treatment; Water management; Public health; Socio-hydrology
• ISSN: 0022-1694; 1879-2707
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.049

•Approximately 1100 private DWWTS owners and users surveyed.•Significant knowledge gaps and perception-based patterns exist within population.•Lack of awareness of DWWTS as contaminant source among susceptible consumers.•Three “attitudinal” respondent clusters revealed and quantified.•Finding may be used by myriad shareholders for effective legislative engagement. Numerous studies have highlighted and quantified the role of domestic wastewater treatment systems (DWWTSs) as significant sources of human-specific aquatic contaminants in both developed and developing regions, particularly with respect to private and municipal groundwater supplies. However, from a socio-hydrological perspective, little work has focused on these systems and the potential environmental and human burden posed. This is of particular relevance in the Republic of Ireland, where approximately one third of the population is serviced by DWWTSs. The objective of the current study was to examine levels of awareness and subsequent behavioural tendencies among owners and users of DWWTSs in the Republic of Ireland, particularly in light of recent and future (national and EU) legislative amendments. Structured questionnaires were completed bi-modally with 1106 Irish respondents. Analysis identified a number of significant knowledge gaps which currently exist among DWWTS users in Ireland. These were associated with environmentally inadvisable behavioural practises, potentially leading to increased contamination vulnerability and subsequently, increased human exposure to waterborne contaminants. Household water supply type was significantly associated with DWWTS threat acknowledgement (p=0.014), with unregulated private groundwater users exhibited the lowest awareness of DWWTS as a potential source of aquatic contaminants despite being the group at greatest risk. A bi-modal clustering approach was employed, with respondents found to fall into one of three distinct “attitudinal” clusters. Future engagement strategies should strive to provide guidance regarding the role of people and their activities within the hydrological cycle. The current study reinforces this conclusion, while providing evidence-based recommendations regarding provision of demographically focused educational strategies; these will further increase environmental policy compliance, and in so doing, decrease the human health and environmental contamination burden posed by DWWTSs.