Inability of Radioiodine Remnant Ablation to Improve Postoperative Outcome in Adult Patients with Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

• Published in: Mayo Clinic proceedings
• Main Authors: Hay, Ian D, Kaggal, Suneetha, Iniguez-Ariza, Nicole M, Reinalda, Megan S, Wiseman, Gregory A, Thompson, Geoffrey B
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01.07.2021
• ISSN: 1942-5546
• DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.02.009

To determine whether radioiodine remnant ablation (RRA) reduces cause-specific mortality (CSM) or tumor recurrence (TR) rate after bilateral lobar resection (BLR). There were 2952 low-risk adult papillary thyroid cancer (LRAPTC) patients (with MACIS scores <6) who underwent potentially curative BLR during 1955-2014. During 1955-1974, 1975-1994, and 1995-2014, RRA was administered in 3%, 49%, and 28%. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software. During 1955-1974, the 20-year CSM and TR rates after BLR alone were 1.0% and 6.8%; rates after BLR+RRA were 0% (P=.63) and 5.9% (P=.82). During 1975-1994, post-BLR 20-year rates for CSM and TR were 0.3% and 7.5%; after BLR+RRA, rates were higher at 0.9% (P=.31) and 12.8% (P=.01). When TR rates were examined separately for 448 node-negative and 317 node-positive patients, differences were nonsignificant. In 1995-2014, post-BLR 20-year CSM and TR rates were 0% and 9.2%; rates after BLR+RRA were higher at 1.4% (P=.19) and 21.0% (P<.001). In 890 pN0 cases, 15-year locoregional recurrence rates were 3.4% after BLR and 3.7% after BLR+RRA (P=.99). In 740 pN1 patients, 15-year locoregional recurrence rates were 10% higher after BLR+RRA compared with BLR alone (P=.01). However, this difference became nonsignificant when stratified by numbers of metastatic nodes. RRA administered to LRAPTC patients during 1955-2014 did not reduce either the CSM or TR rate. We would therefore not recommend RRA in LRAPTC patients undergoing BLR with curative intent.