The outcome after stent placement or surgery as the initial treatment for obstructive primary tumor in patients with stage IV colon cancer

Abstract Background It is still a matter of debate as to whether palliative resection of obstructive primary tumors may prolong the survival of patients with obstructive colon cancer and unresectable synchronous metastases. The main goal of this retrospective study was to compare the use of self-exp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of surgery Vol. 203; no. 6; pp. 715 - 719
Main Authors Lee, Won-Suk, M.D., Ph.D, Baek, Jeong-Heum, M.D., Ph.D, Kang, Jin Mo, M.D, Choi, Sangtae, M.D, Kwon, Kwang An, M.D., Ph.D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.06.2012
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background It is still a matter of debate as to whether palliative resection of obstructive primary tumors may prolong the survival of patients with obstructive colon cancer and unresectable synchronous metastases. The main goal of this retrospective study was to compare the use of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) with open surgery for the palliation of patients with respect to survival, morbidity, and the time to start chemotherapy. Methods Between January 2000 and January 2008, 88 consecutive patients (52 who underwent surgery and 36 who underwent SEMS insertion) with obstructive colon cancer and unresectable synchronous metastases were retrospectively evaluated. Results The median hospital stay for all admissions was 7.2 days (range, 3–29 days) in the SEMS group and 12.3 days (range, 6–45 days) in the surgery group ( P = .001). The incidence of stoma formation was significantly lower in the SEMS group than in the surgery group (16.7% vs 38.5%, respectively, P = .021). The median time to starting chemotherapy was significantly shorter in patients who underwent SEMS insertion compared with those who underwent surgery (8.1 vs 21.7 days, respectively, P = .001). The 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 44.2% and 21.27% in the surgery group and 16.7% and 2.8% in the SEMS group, respectively. The median survival for all patients was 15 months from the initiation of treatment (95% confidence interval, 6.0–19 months). Conclusions Both procedures can be safely performed, but the choice of treatment should be individualized and discussed with a multidisciplinary team.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.05.015