Measuring shared knowledge with group false memory

We conducted two experiments to investigate the effects of word list consistency and group collaboration on false memory. Using the DRM (Deese-Roediger-McDermott) paradigm, the first experiment (n = 121) examined false memory in a group; participants collaborated to select keywords using a between-s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScientific reports Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 10117 - 12
Main Authors Arima, Yoshiko, Yukihiro, Ryoji, Hattori, Yosuke
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 04.07.2018
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We conducted two experiments to investigate the effects of word list consistency and group collaboration on false memory. Using the DRM (Deese-Roediger-McDermott) paradigm, the first experiment (n = 121) examined false memory in a group; participants collaborated to select keywords using a between-subject condition of a consistent or randomized word list. The proportion of false responses was larger than that of error responses, especially for the consistent word list condition (p < 0.001), and group collaboration increased false recognition for both word lists (p < 0.001). Using an applied within-subject word list condition, the second experiment (n = 119) confirmed the results of Experiment 1. Furthermore, individual differences Euclidean distance model analysis revealed a difference in the shared cognitive dimension related to group false memory.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-28347-4