Effects of Soft Corals on Scleractinian Coral Recruitment. II: Allelopathy, Spat Survivorship and Reef Community Structure

• Published in: Marine ecology (Berlin, West) Vol. 22; no. 4; pp. 397 - 414
• Main Authors: Maida, Mauro, Sammarco, Paul W., Coll, John C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin Blackwell Wissenschaftsverlag 01.12.2001; Blackwell
• Subjects: Acroporidae; allelopathy; Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Anthozoa; Biological and medical sciences; community structure; coral reef; Fresh water ecosystems; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Great Barrier Reef; Marine; mortality; Octocorallia; Pocilloporidae; recruitment; Sarcophyton glaucum; Scleractinia; scleractinian; Sea water ecosystems; Sinularia flexibilis; Soft coral; spat; Synecology; Australia; Oceania; Great Barrier Reef; ISEW, Australia, Queensland, Great Barrier Reef, Lizard I; ISEW, Australia, Queensland, Great Barrier Reef, Orpheus I; Marine environment; Community structure; Coelenterata; Coral; Growth; Mortality; Cnidaria; Population recruitment; Allelopathy; Invertebrata; Survival
• ISSN: 0173-9565; 1439-0485
• DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0485.2001.01709.x

. Two field experiments were performed on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia, at Orpheus Island and Lizard Island, respectively, to investigate the effects of allelopathic soft corals on survivorship and community structure of scleractinian coral spat. Ceramic tiles were placed around the allelopathic soft corals Sinularia flexibilis (Quoy & Gaimard 1833) and Sarcophyton glaucum (Quoy & Gaimard 1833), and controls. One control consisted of settlement plates surrounding a scleractinian coral (non‐allelopathic planktivore); another control had no adult soft or scleractinian coral present. The experimental soft corals affected the recruitment of various taxonomic groups of coral spat differentially, as evidenced by the diversity of coral spat settling in treatments and controls. At Orpheus Island (O.I., n = 1038 spat) and Lizard Island (L.I., n = 7032 spat), there were significant differences between recruitment success of the two dominant coral taxa, Pocilloporidae (O.I., 61.4 %; L.I., 20.5 %) and Acroporidae (O.I., 33.7 %; L.I., 53 %). Settlement plates exposed to Sinularia flexibilis at either site had the lowest proportion of acroporid recruits. Diversity indices (Shannon‐Wiener Indices) varied significantly between treatments at both Orpheus and Lizard Islands. This appears to be due to selective inhibition of acroporid spat by Sinularia flexibilis at both sites. Growth of coral spat was higher on settlement plates in the presence of Sarcophyton at Lizard Island. Settlement of most associated epibiota was generally inhibited under these conditions. Coral spat survivorship was highest in the presence of Sinularia at Orpheus ­Island; at Lizard Island, this was the case with the Sarcophyton treatment. Higher survivorship, and in some cases growth, of coral spat near soft corals was apparently due to reduced competition for space between spat and associated epibiota. This hypothesis is supported by the results of a sister experiment where a coating of Sinularia flexibilis extract on settlement tiles significantly decreased fouling by sessile epibiota. Soft corals have an allelopathic effect on recruitment and early development of scleractinian corals and, consequently, on early coral reef community succession.