The effect of upper ocean eddies on the non-steric contribution to the barotropic mode

The non‐steric contribution to sea surface height (SSH) variability hampers the use of satellite altimeter data in mapping steric‐related variability. Here, two eddy‐resolving 1/16° world ocean simulations are used to investigate the effects of mesoscale flow instabilities on the non‐steric (or abys...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGeophysical research letters Vol. 27; no. 17; pp. 2713 - 2716
Main Authors Shriver, Jay F., Hurlburt, Harley E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2000
American Geophysical Union
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The non‐steric contribution to sea surface height (SSH) variability hampers the use of satellite altimeter data in mapping steric‐related variability. Here, two eddy‐resolving 1/16° world ocean simulations are used to investigate the effects of mesoscale flow instabilities on the non‐steric (or abyssal ocean) contribution to the global barotropic mode. Model results show the non‐steric component accounting for >50% of the total SSH variability over 37% of the world ocean in the model, predominantly at mid and high latitudes. Most of this is either wind‐driven and deterministic or eddy‐driven and nondeterministic. Upper ocean flow instabilities drive deep flows and generate non‐steric SSH variability maxima (5–10 cm rms or more) in many major current systems throughout the world ocean. Resulting ocean anomalies are a nondeterministic response to atmospheric forcing and an eddy‐resolving data‐assimilative ocean model that demonstrates the essential dynamics is needed to depict their evolution.
Bibliography:istex:45133B630C7E13997FD0C13C05F24B01195D5D6D
ark:/67375/WNG-NDSTCK6W-F
ArticleID:1999GL011105
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0094-8276
1944-8007
DOI:10.1029/1999GL011105