Using genetic techniques to quantify reinvasion, survival and in situ breeding rates during control operations

Determining the origin of individuals caught during a control/eradication programme enables conservation managers to assess the reinvasion rates of their target species and evaluate the level of success of their control methods. We examine how genetic techniques can focus management by distinguishin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMolecular ecology Vol. 22; no. 20; pp. 5071 - 5083
Main Authors Veale, A. J, Edge, K.‐A, McMurtrie, P, Fewster, R. M, Clout, M. N, Gleeson, D. M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Science 01.10.2013
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Determining the origin of individuals caught during a control/eradication programme enables conservation managers to assess the reinvasion rates of their target species and evaluate the level of success of their control methods. We examine how genetic techniques can focus management by distinguishing between hypotheses of ‘reinvasion’ and ‘survivor’, and defining kin groups for invasive stoats (Mustela erminea) on Secretary Island, New Zealand. 205 stoats caught on the island were genotyped at 16 microsatellite loci, along with 40 stoats from the opposing mainland coast, and the age and sex were determined for each individual. Using these data, we compare and combine a variety of genetic techniques including genetic clustering, population assignment and kinship‐based techniques to assess the origin of each stoat. The population history and individual movement could be described in fine detail, with results indicating that both in‐situ survival and breeding, and reinvasion are occurring. Immigration to the island was found to be generally low, apart from in 1 year where around 8 stoats emigrated from the mainland. This increased immigration was probably linked to a stoat population spike on the mainland in that year, caused by a masting event of southern beech forest (Nothofagus sp.) and the subsequent rodent irruption. Our study provides an example of some of the ways genetic analyses can feed directly into informing management practices for invasive species.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.12453
Fig. S1 Stoat capture tally on Secretary Island from 2005 until December 2011.Table S1 Inbreeding Coefficient (FIS) between the Mainland stoat population and each capture year on Secretary Island.
ark:/67375/WNG-PSTGX52T-D
Invasive Mammal Impacts Program - No. C09X0909
Crown Research Institutes
istex:D4667E7FFE9FFF8A21240209A53B2391798CABD2
ArticleID:MEC12453
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0962-1083
1365-294X
DOI:10.1111/mec.12453