The number of needle passes affects the accuracy of parathyroid hormone assay with intraoperative parathyroid aspiration

Abstract Introduction Intraoperative aspiration of a nodule and parathyroid hormone (PTH) assay has been shown to accurately confirm parathyroid tissue. However, the reported aspiration technique varies in the literature. We sought to determine if the number of passes affected the accuracy of PTH an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of surgery Vol. 200; no. 6; pp. 701 - 706
Main Authors Guerrero, Marlon A., M.D, Suh, Insoo, M.D, Vriens, Menno R., M.D, Shen, Wen T., M.D, Gosnell, Jessica, M.D, Kebebew, Electron, M.D, Clark, Orlo H., M.D, Duh, Quan-Yang, M.D
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.12.2010
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Introduction Intraoperative aspiration of a nodule and parathyroid hormone (PTH) assay has been shown to accurately confirm parathyroid tissue. However, the reported aspiration technique varies in the literature. We sought to determine if the number of passes affected the accuracy of PTH analysis. Methods A prospective analysis was performed on 25 consecutive patients who underwent a parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. The excised parathyroid gland was aspirated using 1, 3, and 5 passes. The data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank, chi-square, and Fisher exact tests to calculate the 2-tailed P value. Results Of the 26 glands aspirated, the mean PTH value varied with the number of passes, 2,073 pg/mL for 1 pass, 2,347 for 3 passes, and 2,695 for 5 passes ( P = .02). Accuracy was dependent on the number of passes, with 5 passes ( P = .018) having less PTH variation than 1 or 3 passes. Conclusions Aspiration of nodules to determine the PTH level helps confirm the presence of parathyroid tissue. The number of needle passes affects the accuracy of the PTH level, with 5 passes being the optimal number of passes to attain no false-negative results.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.012