Risk Scoring Systems for Preterm Birth and Their Performance: A Systematic Review

• Published in: Journal of clinical medicine Vol. 12; no. 13; p. 4360
• Main Authors: Ferreira, Amaro, Bernardes, João, Gonçalves, Hernâni
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 28.06.2023; MDPI
• Subjects: Babies; Citation management software; Clinical medicine; Cohort analysis; Diagnosis; Ethnicity; Gestational age; Gynecology; Pregnancy; Premature birth; Premature labor; Risk factors; Systematic Review; Variables; Portugal; preterm birth; fetal monitoring; risk factors; performance; risk scoring systems; pregnancy
• ISSN: 2077-0383; 2077-0383
• DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134360

Nowadays, the risk stratification of preterm birth (PTB) and its prediction remain a challenge. Many risk factors associated with PTB have been identified, and risk scoring systems (RSSs) have been developed to face this challenge. The objectives of this systematic review were to identify RSSs for PTB, the variables they consist of, and their performance. Two databases were searched, and two authors independently performed the screening and eligibility phases. Records studying an RSS, based on specified variables, with an evaluation of the predictive value for PTB, were considered eligible. Reference lists of eligible studies and review articles were also searched. Data from the included studies were extracted. A total of 56 studies were included in this review. The most frequently incorporated variables in the RSS included in this review were maternal age, weight, history of smoking, history of previous PTB, and cervical length. The performance measures varied widely among the studies, with sensitivity ranging between 4.2% and 92.0% and area under the curve (AUC) between 0.59 and 0.95. Despite the recent technological and scientifical evolution with a better understanding of variables related to PTB and the definition of new ultrasonographic parameters and biomarkers associated with PTB, the RSS's ability to predict PTB remains poor in most situations, thus compromising the integration of a single RSS in clinical practice. The development of new RSSs, the identification of new variables associated with PTB, and the elaboration of a large reference dataset might be a step forward to tackle the problem of PTB.