Metal-On-Metal or Ceramic-On-Ceramic for Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background Hard bearings, metal-on-metal (MOM) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) have been developed to overcome polyethylene wear-related osteolysis, but comparisons between these two hard bearings are limited. We performed a meta-analysis to determine revision rates for (1) any reason, (2) ase...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of arthroplasty Vol. 31; no. 11; pp. 2637 - 2645.e1
Main Authors Lee, Young-Kyun, Yoon, Byung-Ho, Choi, Yun Seong, MD, Jo, Woo-Lam, MD, Ha, Yong-Chan, Koo, Kyung-Hoi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background Hard bearings, metal-on-metal (MOM) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) have been developed to overcome polyethylene wear-related osteolysis, but comparisons between these two hard bearings are limited. We performed a meta-analysis to determine revision rates for (1) any reason, (2) aseptic loosening, (3) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), and (4) recurrent dislocation between MOM and COC bearings in cementless THA. Methods This analysis included 3 studies comparing COC and MOM bearings and 56 studies reporting outcomes of MOM or COC bearings. We conducted a comparison meta-analysis (with a fixed-effects model) on the three comparative studies, and a proportional meta-analysis on the data from the 59 articles in order to determine a consensus. Results In the comparison meta-analysis, MOM showed higher revision rate than COC for any reason (OR = 2.39, p = 0.046) and PJI (OR = 6.21, p = 0.015). In the proportion meta-analysis, the MOM group showed significantly higher revision rate than COC group for any reason, aseptic loosening, and PJI. Conclusions MOM bearings were associated with a higher risk of revision for any reason and PJI than COC bearings after cementless THA.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0883-5403
1532-8406
DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2016.04.014