Clinically validated mutation scores for HIV-1 resistance to fosamprenavir/ritonavir

Background We developed clinically relevant genotypic scores for resistance to fosamprenavir/ritonavir in HIV-1 protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced patients. Methods PI-experienced patients with virological failure receiving fosamprenavir/ritonavir as the sole PI for at least 3 months and with detec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of antimicrobial chemotherapy Vol. 61; no. 6; pp. 1362 - 1368
Main Authors Masquelier, B., Assoumou, K. L., Descamps, D., Bocket, L., Cottalorda, J., Ruffault, A., Marcelin, A. G., Morand-Joubert, L., Tamalet, C., Charpentier, C., Peytavin, G., Antoun, Z., Brun-Vézinet, F., Costagliola, D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.06.2008
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects
HIV
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background We developed clinically relevant genotypic scores for resistance to fosamprenavir/ritonavir in HIV-1 protease inhibitor (PI)-experienced patients. Methods PI-experienced patients with virological failure receiving fosamprenavir/ritonavir as the sole PI for at least 3 months and with detectable fosamprenavir plasma levels were included. The impact of baseline protease mutations on virological response (VR, i.e. decrease in plasma HIV-1 RNA between baseline and month 3) was analysed using the Mann–Whitney test. Mutations with prevalence >10% and P value <0.10 were retained. The Jonckheere–Terpstra test was used to select the combination of mutations most strongly associated with VR. The association between score and VR was assessed by multivariate backward regression. Results In the 73 patients included, the median baseline HIV-1 RNA was 4.6 log10 copies/mL (range: 2.7–6.9) and the mean decrease at month 3 was −1.07 ± 1.40 log10 copies/mL. Ninety per cent of the patients were infected by HIV-1 subtype B variants. Two fosamprenavir/ritonavir mutation scores were constructed: score A (L10F/I/V + L33F + M36I + I54L/M/V/A/T/S + I62V + V82A/F/C/G + I84V + L90M) was based only on mutations associated with a worse VR, whereas score B (L10FIV + L33F + M36I + I54L/M/V/A/T/S + A71V − V77I − N88S + L90M) also took into account favourable mutations. Both scores were independent predictors of VR, however, co-administration of tenofovir was associated with a worse VR and the presence of the N88S protease mutation and co-administration of enfuvirtide with a better VR. Conclusions These clinically validated mutation scores should be of interest for the clinical management of PI-experienced patients. The fosamprenavir/ritonavir score A was introduced in the 2006 ANRS algorithm along with isolated mutations I50V and V32I + I47V.
Bibliography:Participants are listed in the Acknowledgements section.
istex:69C554E618B2A9593DE4345BB367834957DD37D3
ArticleID:dkn127
ark:/67375/HXZ-5LVW709W-R
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0305-7453
1460-2091
DOI:10.1093/jac/dkn127