Significance of modified Glasgow prognostic score as a useful indicator for prognosis of patients with gastric carcinoma

Abstract Background The significance of the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), an inflammation-based prognostic score, as an indicator of aggressiveness in gastric carcinoma has not been investigated fully. Methods Two hundred thirty-two patients with gastric carcinoma were enrolled. Patients who had b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of surgery Vol. 201; no. 2; pp. 186 - 191
Main Authors Nozoe, Tadahiro, M.D, Iguchi, Tomohiro, M.D, Egashira, Akinori, M.D, Adachi, Eisuke, M.D, Matsukuma, Akito, M.D, Ezaki, Takahiro, M.D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.02.2011
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background The significance of the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), an inflammation-based prognostic score, as an indicator of aggressiveness in gastric carcinoma has not been investigated fully. Methods Two hundred thirty-two patients with gastric carcinoma were enrolled. Patients who had both an elevated C-reactive protein (>1.0 mg/dL) and hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL) were allocated a traditional GPS (TGPS) of 2. Patients who had one of these abnormal values were allocated a TGPS of 1, and patients who had neither were allocated a TGPS of 0. Results There existed a significant difference between the survival of adjacent groups of patients when examined using the TGPS ( P = .05 for TGPS 0 vs 1 and P = .006 for TGPS 1 vs 2). Multivariate analysis based on TGPS demonstrated that TGPS ( P = .020) and tumor stage ( P = .0007) proved to be independent prognostic indicators for worse prognosis. Conclusions The preoperative measurement of an inflammation-based prognostic score can demonstrate a strict stratification for the prognosis of patients with gastric carcinoma.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.030