Theoretical uncertainties for global satellite-derived burned area estimates

Quantitative information on the error properties of global satellite-derived burned area (BA) products is essential for evaluating the quality of these products, e.g. against modelled BA estimates. We estimate theoretical uncertainties for three widely used global satellite-derived BA products using...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiogeosciences Vol. 16; no. 16; pp. 3147 - 3164
Main Authors Brennan, James, Gómez-Dans, Jose L, Disney, Mathias, Lewis, Philip
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Katlenburg-Lindau Copernicus GmbH 23.08.2019
Copernicus Publications
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Quantitative information on the error properties of global satellite-derived burned area (BA) products is essential for evaluating the quality of these products, e.g. against modelled BA estimates. We estimate theoretical uncertainties for three widely used global satellite-derived BA products using a multiplicative triple collocation error model. The approach provides spatially unique uncertainties at 1∘ for the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Collection 6 burned area product (MCD64), the MODIS Collection 5.1 (MCD45) product, and the European Space Agency (ESA) Climate Change Initiative Fire product version 5.0 (FireCCI50) for 2001–2013. The uncertainties on mean global burned area for three products are 3.76±0.15×106 km2 for MCD64, 3.70±0.17×106 km2 for FireCCI50, and 3.31±0.18×106 km2 for MCD45. These correspond to relative uncertainties of 4 %–5.5 % and also indicate previous uncertainty estimates to be underestimated. Relative uncertainties are 8 %–10 % in Africa and Australia, for example, and larger in regions with less annual burned area. The method provides uncertainties that are likely to be more consistent with modelling and data analysis studies due to their spatially explicit properties. These properties are also intended to allow spatially explicit validation of current burned area products.
ISSN:1726-4189
1726-4170
1726-4189
DOI:10.5194/bg-16-3147-2019