Maturation of Visual and Auditory Temporal Processing in School-Aged Children

Contact author: Piers Dawes, who is now with the Wellcome Language and Reading Project, Department of Psychology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. E-mail: pd524{at}york.ac.uk . Purpose: To examine development of sensitivity to auditory and visual temporal processes in children and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of speech, language, and hearing research Vol. 51; no. 4; pp. 1002 - 1015
Main Authors Dawes, Piers, Bishop, Dorothy V. M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States ASHA 01.08.2008
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1092-4388
1558-9102
DOI10.1044/1092-4388(2008/073)

Cover

More Information
Summary:Contact author: Piers Dawes, who is now with the Wellcome Language and Reading Project, Department of Psychology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. E-mail: pd524{at}york.ac.uk . Purpose: To examine development of sensitivity to auditory and visual temporal processes in children and the association with standardized measures of auditory processing and communication. Methods: Normative data on tests of visual and auditory processing were collected on 18 adults and 98 children aged 6–10 years of age. Auditory processes included detection of pitch from temporal cues using iterated rippled noise and frequency modulation detection at 2 Hz, 40 Hz, and 240 Hz. Visual processes were coherent form and coherent motion detection. Test–retest data were gathered on 21 children. Results: Performance on perceptual tasks improved with age, except for fine temporal processing (iterated rippled noise) and coherent form perception, both of which were relatively stable over the age range. Within-subject variability (as assessed by track width) did not account for age-related change. There was no evidence for a common temporal processing factor, and there were no significant associations between perceptual task performance and communication level (Children's Communication Checklist, 2nd ed.; D. V. M. Bishop, 2003) or speech-based auditory processing (SCAN-C; R. W. Keith, 2000). Conclusions: The auditory tasks had different developmental trajectories despite a common procedure, indicating that age-related change was not solely due to responsiveness to task demands. The 2-Hz frequency modulation detection task, previously used in dyslexia research, and the visual tasks had low reliability compared to other measures. KEY WORDS: maturation, auditory processing, visual processing, attention CiteULike     Connotea     Del.icio.us     Digg     Facebook     Reddit     Technorati     Twitter     What's this?
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1092-4388
1558-9102
DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/073)