Optimal threshold of controlled attenuation parameter with MRI‐PDFF as the gold standard for the detection of hepatic steatosis

The optimal threshold of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) for the detection of hepatic steatosis using both M and XL probe is unknown in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI‐PDFF) is an accurate and precise method of detecting th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Vol. 67; no. 4; pp. 1348 - 1359
Main Authors Caussy, Cyrielle, Alquiraish, Mosab H., Nguyen, Phirum, Hernandez, Carolyn, Cepin, Sandra, Fortney, Lynda E., Ajmera, Veeral, Bettencourt, Ricki, Collier, Summer, Hooker, Jonathan, Sy, Ethan, Rizo, Emily, Richards, Lisa, Sirlin, Claude B., Loomba, Rohit
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.04.2018
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The optimal threshold of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) for the detection of hepatic steatosis using both M and XL probe is unknown in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI‐PDFF) is an accurate and precise method of detecting the presence of hepatic steatosis that is superior to CAP. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and optimal threshold of CAP for the detection of hepatic steatosis as defined by MRI‐PDFF ≥ 5%. This prospective cross‐sectional study included 119 adults (59% women) with and without NAFLD who underwent MRI‐PDFF and CAP using either M or XL probe when indicated within a 6‐month period at the NAFLD Research Center, University of California, San Diego. The mean ( ± standard deviation) age and body mass index were 52.4 (±15.2) years and 29.9 (±5.5) kg/m2, respectively. The prevalence of NAFLD (MRI‐PDFF ≥ 5%) and MRI‐PDFF ≥ 10% was 70.6% and 47.1%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of CAP for the detection of MRI‐PDFF ≥ 5% was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70‐0.90) at the cut‐point of 288 dB/m and of MRI‐PDFF ≥ 10% was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.80‐0.94) at the cut‐point of 306 dB/m. When stratified by the interquartile range (IQR) of CAP, we observed that an IQR below the median (30 dB/m) had a robust AUROC compared with an IQR above the median (0.92 [95% CI, 0.85‐1.00] versus 0.70 [95% CI, 0.56‐0.85]; P = 0.0117), and these differences were statistically and clinically significant. Conclusion: The cut‐point of CAP for presence of hepatic steatosis (MRI‐PDFF ≥ 5%) was 288 dB/m. The diagnostic accuracy of CAP for the detection of hepatic steatosis is more reliable when the IQR of CAP is <30 dB/m. These data have implications for the clinical use of CAP in the assessment of NAFLD. (Hepatology 2018;67:1348‐1359)
Bibliography:Rohit Loomba is supported in part by the American Gastroenterological Association Foundation–Sucampo–ASP Designated Research Award in Geriatric Gastroenterology and by a T. Franklin Williams Scholarship Award (funding provided by Atlantic Philanthropies, Inc, the John A. Hartford Foundation, OM, the Association of Specialty Professors, and the American Gastroenterological Association and grant K23‐DK090303). Claude B. Sirlin and Rohit Loomba serve as co‐PIs on the grant R01‐DK106419. Cyrielle Caussy is supported by grants from the Société Francophone du Diabète, the Philippe Foundation, and Monahan Foundation under the Fulbright program.
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Potential conflicts of interest: Claude B. Sirlin consults, advises, and is on the speakers' bureau for Bayer; is on the speakers' bureau and has received grants from GE Healthcare; and has received grants from Siemens. Rohit Loomba has received grant from Siemens and GE Healthcare.
PMCID: PMC5867216
ISSN:0270-9139
1527-3350
DOI:10.1002/hep.29639