Separation and determination of seven fluoroquinolones by pressurized capillary electrochromatography

In this paper, pressurized CEC was used for the separation and determination of seven fluoroquinolones (FQs). The effect of different experimental conditions, such as the concentration and pH of the buffer, the organic modifier concentration, the surfactant and ion‐paring agents added to the electro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of separation science Vol. 28; no. 16; pp. 2210 - 2217
Main Authors Lü, Haixia, Wu, Xiaoping, Xie, Zenghong, Lin, Xucong, Guo, Liangqia, Yan, Chao, Chen, Guonan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Weinheim WILEY-VCH Verlag 01.11.2005
WILEY‐VCH Verlag
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this paper, pressurized CEC was used for the separation and determination of seven fluoroquinolones (FQs). The effect of different experimental conditions, such as the concentration and pH of the buffer, the organic modifier concentration, the surfactant and ion‐paring agents added to the electrolyte, and applied voltage were studied. All the seven FQs were baseline separated using mobile phase containing 27% v/v ACN, 5 mmol/L Na2HPO4 buffer (pH 4.0 adjusted using citric acid), 11 mmol/L SDS, and 0.01% TEA v/v at detection wavelength of 287 nm and at an applied voltage of –10 kV. The calibration curves were linear (r >0.9991) over a concentration range of 1.0–50.0 mg/L for norfloxacin (NFLX); 2.5–50.0 mg/L for fleroxacin (FLX), ciprofloxacin (CPFX), and lomefloxacin (LMX); and 5.0–50.0 mg/L for enoxacin (ENX), ofloxacin (OFLX), and gatifloxacin (GFLX). The detection limits (S/N = 3) for ENX, OFLX, FLX, NFLX, CPFX, LMX, and GFLX were 0.5, 0.8, 0.4, 0.2, 0.4, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/L, respectively. The method is simple, rapid, and reproducible. It was successfully applied to the analysis of fish muscle samples spiked with FQs. Mean recoveries ranged from 81.6 to 97.6%.
Bibliography:istex:8114BB6A1EDE0304D09556A4758E7646408C20C4
ark:/67375/WNG-QWK8P9TQ-3
ArticleID:JSSC200500175
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1615-9306
1615-9314
DOI:10.1002/jssc.200500175