Isolation and characterization of two different forms of inositol phospholipid-specific phospholipase C from rat brain

• Published in: The Journal of biological chemistry Vol. 263; no. 14; pp. 6592 - 6598
• Main Authors: Homma, Y, Imaki, J, Nakanishi, O, Takenawa, T
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bethesda, MD Elsevier Inc 15.05.1988; American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
• Subjects: Analytical, structural and metabolic biochemistry; Animals; Biological and medical sciences; brain; Brain - enzymology; Chromatography, Affinity; Chromatography, Gel; Chromatography, Ion Exchange; Enzymes and enzyme inhibitors; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Hydrolases; Isoenzymes - isolation & purification; Isoenzymes - metabolism; Kinetics; Peptide Mapping; Phosphatidylinositols - metabolism; phospholipase C; Rats; Substrate Specificity; Type C Phospholipases - isolation & purification; Type C Phospholipases - metabolism; Brain; Purification; Rat; Gel electrophoresis; Enzyme; Isozyme; Rodentia; HPLC chromatography; Ion exchange chromatography; Phospholipase C; Peptide map; Vertebrata; Mammalia; Immunoblotting assay
• ISSN: 0021-9258; 1083-351X
• DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)68682-X

Two different forms of inositol phospholipid-specific phospholipase C (PLC) have been purified 2810- and 4010-fold, respectively, from a crude extract of rat brain. The purification procedures consisted of chromatography of both enzymes on Affi-Gel blue and cellulose phosphate, followed by three sequential high performance liquid chromatography steps, which were different for the two enzymes. The resultant preparations each contained homogeneous enzyme with a Mr of 85,000 as determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. One of these enzymes (PLC-II) was found to hydrolyze phosphatidyl-inositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) at a rate of 15.3 mumol/min/mg of protein and also phosphatidylinositol 4-monophosphate and phosphatidylinositol (PI) at slower rates. For hydrolysis of PI, this enzyme was activated by an acidic pH and a high concentration of Ca2+ and showed a Vmax value of 19.2 mumol/min/mg of protein. The other enzyme (PLC-III) catalyzed hydrolysis of PIP2 preferentially at a Vmax rate of 12.9 mumol/min/mg of protein and catalyzed that of phosphatidylinositol 4-monophosphate slightly. The rate of PIP2 hydrolysis by this enzyme exceeded that of PI under all conditions tested. Neither of these enzymes had any activity on phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylserine, or phosphatidic acid. These two enzymes showed not only biochemical but also structural differences. Western blotting showed that antibodies directed against PLC-II did not react with PLC-III. Furthermore, the two enzymes gave different peptide maps after digestion with alpha-chymotrypsin or Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease. These results suggest that these two forms of PLC belong to different families of PLC.