Marginal and internal fit of 3D printed provisional crowns according to build directions
PURPOSEThis study aimed to fabricate provisional crowns at varying build directions using the digital light processing (DLP)-based 3D printing and evaluate the marginal and internal fit of the provisional crowns using the silicone replica technique (SRT). MATERIALS AND METHODSThe prepared resin toot...
Saved in:
Published in | The journal of advanced prosthodontics Vol. 12; no. 4; pp. 225 - 232 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
01.08.2020
대한치과보철학회 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | PURPOSEThis study aimed to fabricate provisional crowns at varying build directions using the digital light processing (DLP)-based 3D printing and evaluate the marginal and internal fit of the provisional crowns using the silicone replica technique (SRT). MATERIALS AND METHODSThe prepared resin tooth was scanned and a single crown was designed using computer-aided design (CAD) software. Provisional crowns were printed using a DLP-based 3D printer at 6 directions (120°, 135°, 150°, 180°, 210°, 225°) with 10 crowns in each direction. In total, sixty crowns were printed. To measure the marginal and internal fit, a silicone replica was fabricated and the thickness of the silicone impression material was measured using a digital microscope. Sixteen reference points were set and divided into the following 4 groups: marginal gap (MG), cervical gap (CG), axial gap (AG), and occlusal gap (OG). The measurements were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Dunnett T3. RESULTSMG, CG, and OG were significantly different by build angle groups (P<.05). The MG and CG were significantly larger in the 120° group than in other groups. OG was the smallest in the 150° and 180° and the largest in the 120° and 135° groups. CONCLUSIONThe marginal and internal fit of the 3D-printed provisional crowns can vary depending on the build angle and the best fit was achieved with build angles of 150° and 180°. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.4.225 |
ISSN: | 2005-7806 2005-7814 |
DOI: | 10.4047/jap.2020.12.4.225 |