Array comparative genomic hybridisation testing in CHD

• Published in: Cardiology in the young Vol. 25; no. 6; pp. 1155 - 1172
• Main Authors: Hightower, Hannah B., Robin, Nathaniel H., Mikhail, Fady M., Ambalavanan, Namasivayam
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.08.2015
• Subjects: Alabama; Comparative Genomic Hybridization - methods; Databases as Topic; DNA Copy Number Variations - genetics; Heart Defects, Congenital - diagnosis; Humans; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - methods; Original Articles; Retrospective Studies; Alabama; array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH); copy number variants; CHD
• ISSN: 1047-9511; 1467-1107
• DOI: 10.1017/S1047951114001838

Background: CHD is the leading cause of mortality due to birth defects. Array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) detects submicroscopic copy number changes and may improve identification of the genetic basis of CHD. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 1252 patients from a regional referral centre who had undergone aCGH. Of the patients, 173 had CHD. A whole-genome custom-designed oligonucleotide array with >44,000 probes was used to detect copy number changes. Results: Of the 1252 patients, 335 (26.76%) had abnormal aCGH results. Of the 173 patients with CHD, 50 (28.9%) had abnormal aCGH results versus 284 (26.3%) of 1079 non-cardiac patients. There were six patients with CHD who had well-described syndromes such as Wolf–Hirschhorn, trisomy 13, DiGeorge, and Williams. Of the patients with CHD, those with left-sided heart disease had the highest proportion (14/31; 45.13%) of abnormal aCGH results, followed by those with conotruncal heart disease (10/29; 34.48%), endocardial cushion defects (13/50; 26%), complex/other heart disease (12/52; 23.08%), and patent ductus arteriosus (1/11; 9.09%). Conclusions: Patients with CHD are at a substantial risk of having microdeletions and microduplications. The incidence of abnormalities on aCGH analysis is higher than identified with karyotype, and identification of copy number changes may help identify the genetic basis of the specific heart defects. However, aCGH may not have a significant diagnostic yield in those with isolated CHD. Further research using larger data sets may help identify candidate genes associated with CHD.