Process, structural, and outcome quality indicators to support perioperative opioid stewardship: a rapid review

• Published in: Perioperative medicine (London) Vol. 12; no. 1; p. 34
• Main Authors: Thomas, C, Ayres, M, Pye, K, Yassin, D, Howell, S J, Alderson, S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 10.07.2023; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Abdomen; Abdominal surgery; Analgesics; Cancer; Cancer research; Colorectal cancer; Colorectal cancer surgery; Mortality; Narcotics; Opioid stewardship; Opioids; Patient education; Patient outcomes; Patients; Quality control; Quality improvement; Quality indicators; Recovery (Medical); Quality indicators; Colorectal cancer surgery; Analgesics; Opioid stewardship; Opioids
• ISSN: 2047-0525; 2047-0525
• DOI: 10.1186/s13741-023-00312-4

Opioids are effective analgesics but can cause harm. Opioid stewardship is key to ensuring that opioids are used effectively and safely. There is no agreed set of quality indicators relating to the use of opioids perioperatively. This work is part of the Yorkshire Cancer Research Bowel Cancer Quality Improvement programme and aims to develop useful quality indicators for the improvement of care and patient outcomes at all stages of the perioperative journey.A rapid review was performed to identify original research and reviews in which quality indicators for perioperative opioid use are described. A data tool was developed to enable reliable and reproducible extraction of opioid quality indicators.A review of 628 abstracts and 118 full-text publications was undertaken. Opioid quality indicators were identified from 47 full-text publications. In total, 128 structure, process and outcome quality indicators were extracted. Duplicates were merged, with the final extraction of 24 discrete indicators. These indicators are based on five topics: patient education, clinician education, pre-operative optimization, procedure, and patient-specific prescribing and de-prescribing and opioid-related adverse drug events.The quality indicators are presented as a toolkit to contribute to practical opioid stewardship. Process indicators were most commonly identified and contribute most to quality improvement. Fewer quality indicators relating to intraoperative and immediate recovery stages of the patient journey were identified. An expert clinician panel will be convened to agree which of the quality indicators identified will be most valuable in our region for the management of patients undergoing surgery for bowel cancer.