An Epistemological Strategy for Initiating Scientific Revolution against WEIRD Psychology
This paper, a reply to the thought-provoking paper The WEIRDest People in the World ? (Henrich, Heine & Norenzayan, 2010), makes the fundamental argument that most research paradigms from Western mainstream psychology, including theories, methods, and research procedures, are all very WEIRD once...
Saved in:
Published in | Integrative psychological & behavioral science Vol. 57; no. 2; pp. 361 - 380 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
01.06.2023
Springer |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This paper, a reply to the thought-provoking paper
The WEIRDest People in the World
? (Henrich, Heine & Norenzayan, 2010), makes the fundamental argument that most research paradigms from Western mainstream psychology, including theories, methods, and research procedures, are all very WEIRD once moved to non-Western cultures. We thus face not only biased samples but also a deeply WEIRD psychology. Implanting such a research paradigm into non-Western societies may result in an episteme of self-colonization by formulating a mentality of normative Eurocentrism, which may hinder not only the understanding of a local culture. Through this paper I draw on Kuhn’s (1962)
Structure of Scientific Revolutions
to argue that a crisis is needed to initiate a scientific revolution against WEIRD psychology. I then draw on Hwang’s (2019a) epistemological strategy as a path for constructing culture-inclusive theories to compliment Western theories found in mainstream psychology. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1932-4502 1936-3567 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12124-022-09681-9 |