An Epistemological Strategy for Initiating Scientific Revolution against WEIRD Psychology

This paper, a reply to the thought-provoking paper The WEIRDest People in the World ? (Henrich, Heine & Norenzayan, 2010), makes the fundamental argument that most research paradigms from Western mainstream psychology, including theories, methods, and research procedures, are all very WEIRD once...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIntegrative psychological & behavioral science Vol. 57; no. 2; pp. 361 - 380
Main Author Hwang, Kwang-Kuo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.06.2023
Springer
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper, a reply to the thought-provoking paper The WEIRDest People in the World ? (Henrich, Heine & Norenzayan, 2010), makes the fundamental argument that most research paradigms from Western mainstream psychology, including theories, methods, and research procedures, are all very WEIRD once moved to non-Western cultures. We thus face not only biased samples but also a deeply WEIRD psychology. Implanting such a research paradigm into non-Western societies may result in an episteme of self-colonization by formulating a mentality of normative Eurocentrism, which may hinder not only the understanding of a local culture. Through this paper I draw on Kuhn’s (1962) Structure of Scientific Revolutions to argue that a crisis is needed to initiate a scientific revolution against WEIRD psychology. I then draw on Hwang’s (2019a) epistemological strategy as a path for constructing culture-inclusive theories to compliment Western theories found in mainstream psychology.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1932-4502
1936-3567
DOI:10.1007/s12124-022-09681-9