Converging economies of care? Immigrant women workers across 17 countries and four care regimes

• Published in: Journal of industrial relations Vol. 66; no. 1; pp. 79 - 103
• Main Author: Lightman, Naomi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01.02.2024; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
• Subjects: Convergence; Efficacy; Employment; Fines and penalties; Globalization; Health education; Health services; Health status; Immigrants; International comparisons; Migrant workers; Neoliberalism; Occupational status; Penalties; Professional training; Representativeness; Social work; Women; Work; Workers; care regime; immigration; cross-national comparison; gender; Care work
• ISSN: 0022-1856; 1472-9296
• DOI: 10.1177/00221856231221639

This study analyses 17 care economies using 2016 Luxembourg Income Study data to contribute to extant debate regarding the ongoing utility of care regimes as a classificatory schema for cross-national comparison. Examining similarities and differences in the provision of low-status work in health, education, social work, and domestic services – the ‘care economy’ – the data reveal devaluation of the labour done by immigrant women care workers, net of national and regime-level variation. In addition, numerous similarities across liberal, corporatist, social democratic, and central and eastern European care regimes emerge, in terms of the overrepresentation of immigrant women in low status care work, and the disproportionate financial penalties these workers incur. Together, findings suggest that notwithstanding national and policy-specific differences, there has been considerable convergence across economies of care towards a ‘migrant in the market’ model of employment. Such large-scale evidence of this trend calls into question the ongoing efficacy of care regimes for national comparisons of migrant care work under conditions of neoliberal globalization.