Comparison of Two Techniques for Assessing the Shaping Efficacy of Repeatedly Used Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments

• Published in: Journal of endodontics Vol. 37; no. 6; pp. 847 - 850
• Main Authors: Ounsi, Hani F., DCD, DESE, MSc, Franciosi, Giovanni, Paragliola, Raffaele, Al Huzaimi, Khalid, BDS, MSc, Salameh, Ziad, DDS, MSc, PhD, Tay, Franklin R., BDS (Hons), PhD, Ferrari, Marco, DDS, MD, PhD, Grandini, Simone, DDS, PhD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.06.2011
• Subjects: Coloring Agents; Dental Alloys - chemistry; Dental Pulp Cavity - anatomy & histology; Dentistry; Endocrinology & Metabolism; Equipment Design; Equipment Reuse; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Ink; Materials Testing; Models, Anatomic; Nickel - chemistry; Nickel-titanium; Photography; repeated use; root canal; Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation; shaping; Titanium - chemistry; X-Ray Microtomography; root canal; Nickel-titanium; repeated use; shaping
• ISSN: 0099-2399; 1878-3554
• DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.030

Abstract Introduction The shaping capacity of nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary instruments is often assessed by photographic or micro–computed tomography (micro-CT) measurements, and these instruments are often used more than once clinically. This study was conducted to compare photographic and micro-CT measurements and to assess if the repeated use of NiTi instruments affected the shape of canal preparation. Methods Ten new sets of ProTaper Universal instruments (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) were used in 60 resin blocks simulating curved root canals. Groups 1 to 6 ( n = 10) represented the first to sixth use of the instrument, respectively. Digitized images of the prepared blocks were taken in both mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual (BL) directions and area measurements (mm2 ) were calculated using AutoCAD (Autodesk Inc, San Rafael, CA). The volumes of the same prepared canals were measured using micro-CT (mm3 ). Statistical analysis was performed to detect differences between photographic and volumetric measurements and differences between uses. Results Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed significant differences between groups ( P < .001). Regarding measurement type, there were no significant differences between BL and MD measurements, but there were significant differences between micro-CT and BL measurements ( P < .001) and micro-CT and MD measurements ( P = .001). Significant differences were also noted between uses. Conclusions Within the limitations of the present study, micro-CT scanning is more discriminative of the changes in canal space associated with repeated instrument use than photographic measurements. Canal preparations are significantly smaller after the third use of the same instrument.