Learning opportunities in the clinical setting (LOCS) for medical students: A novel approach
Introduction: Graduate-entry medical programmes (GEP) have been introduced into many UK universities. Their shortened 4-year programme may restrict exposure to the clinical environment. The GEP at Swansea University has introduced Learning Opportunities in the Clinical Setting (LOCS), a novel approa...
Saved in:
Published in | Medical teacher Vol. 33; no. 4; pp. e193 - e198 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Informa UK, Ltd
01.04.2011
Taylor & Francis Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Introduction: Graduate-entry medical programmes (GEP) have been introduced into many UK universities. Their shortened 4-year programme may restrict exposure to the clinical environment. The GEP at Swansea University has introduced Learning Opportunities in the Clinical Setting (LOCS), a novel approach, allowing students to choose half day sessions from a list which aimed at bringing experiential clinical learning to first and second year students on the course.
Methods: During the academic years 2007-2008 and 2008-2009, student feedback was collected anonymously online with the options 'very useful', 'useful' or 'not useful' followed by a free text box space to feedback their experience. The text was assessed using qualitative analysis methodology.
Results: A total of 730 LOCS feedback comments were analysed, 422 were recorded as 'very useful' (58%), 276 were 'useful' (38%) and 32 'not useful' (4%). Students' feedback were divided into positive (1330) and negative (152) comments. Positive themes were broadly divided into four categories: Positive Teacher experience, Positive Clinical experience, Relevance to the course and significant Personal Development.
Conclusion: The LOCS system provides an efficient method of providing students with a choice of additional learning opportunities which has proved popular and, in the opinion of students, educationally effective. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0142-159X 1466-187X |
DOI: | 10.3109/0142159X.2011.557413 |