Modulating Electronic Structures of Inorganic Nanomaterials for Efficient Electrocatalytic Water Splitting

Electrocatalytic water splitting is one of the most promising sustainable energy conversion technologies, but is limited by the sluggish electrochemical reactions. Inorganic nanomaterials have been widely used as efficient catalysts for promoting the electrochemical kinetics. Several approaches to o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAngewandte Chemie International Edition Vol. 58; no. 14; pp. 4484 - 4502
Main Authors Du, Xinchuan, Huang, Jianwen, Zhang, Junjun, Yan, Yichao, Wu, Chunyang, Hu, Yin, Yan, Chaoyi, Lei, Tianyu, Chen, Wei, Fan, Cong, Xiong, Jie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 26.03.2019
EditionInternational ed. in English
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Electrocatalytic water splitting is one of the most promising sustainable energy conversion technologies, but is limited by the sluggish electrochemical reactions. Inorganic nanomaterials have been widely used as efficient catalysts for promoting the electrochemical kinetics. Several approaches to optimize the activities of these nanocatalysts have been developed. The electronic structures of the catalysts play a pivotal role in governing the activity and thus have been identified as an essential descriptor. However, the underlying working mechanisms related to the refined electronic structures remain elusive. To establish the structure–electronic‐behavior–activity relationship, a comprehensive overview of the developed strategies to regulate the electronic structures is presented, emphasizing the surface modification, strain, phase transition, and heterostructure. Current challenges to the fundamental understanding of electron behaviors in the nanocatalysts are fully discussed. Making split happen: Strategies to regulate electronic structures of materials to optimize their electrocatalytic activities in water splitting are summarized in this Review. The structure–electronic‐behavior–activity relationships are highlighted as well as current challenges on understanding the electronic behaviors.
Bibliography:These authors contributed equally to this work.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1433-7851
1521-3773
1521-3773
DOI:10.1002/anie.201810104