Reduced competitive ability in an invasive plant

One explanation for successful plant invaders is that they evolved to be more competitive. An intuitive prediction of this Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability (EICA) hypothesis never previously tested is that invasive populations should outcompete their native ‘ancestors’ in a common environm...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEcology letters Vol. 7; no. 4; pp. 346 - 353
Main Authors Bossdorf, Oliver, Prati, Daniel, Auge, Harald, Schmid, Bernhard
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.04.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:One explanation for successful plant invaders is that they evolved to be more competitive. An intuitive prediction of this Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability (EICA) hypothesis never previously tested is that invasive populations should outcompete their native ‘ancestors’ in a common environment. We tested this idea in a diallel competition experiment with Alliaria petiolata where offspring from native and invasive populations were grown alone or in all pairwise combinations. While without competition, there were no differences between native and invasive populations, native populations outperformed invasive ones when competing against each other. Our results contradict the EICA hypothesis and we conclude that it does not not hold for Alliaria petiolata. Instead, we formulate a new ERCA (Evolutionary Reduced Competitive Ability) hypothesis: if there is less competition in the invasive range and competitive ability involves traits that have a fitness cost, then selection might act against it, thereby reducing intraspecific interactions too.
Bibliography:ArticleID:ELE583
istex:DCE876C110CC80F439FF9AB692D02CA936B63852
ark:/67375/WNG-KGGW7GSH-S
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1461-023X
1461-0248
DOI:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00583.x