Bortezomib, Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride Liposome, and Dexamethasone for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Multi‐Center, Open‐Label Phase I Trial

ABSTRACT Backgrounds Mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome (Lipo‐MIT) has shown clinical benefits in various tumors. However, there is no prospective study evaluating its effectiveness and safety in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). A phase I trial of bortezomib, Lipo‐MIT, and dexamethasone...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer medicine (Malden, MA) Vol. 14; no. 8; pp. e70890 - n/a
Main Authors Zhou, Ya‐Lan, Zhang, Jin‐Qiao, Wang, Wei, Bao, Li, Fang, Bai‐Jun, Gao, Da, Su, Li‐Ping, Chen, Wen‐Ming, Yang, Guang‐Zhong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.04.2025
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Backgrounds Mitoxantrone hydrochloride liposome (Lipo‐MIT) has shown clinical benefits in various tumors. However, there is no prospective study evaluating its effectiveness and safety in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). A phase I trial of bortezomib, Lipo‐MIT, and dexamethasone (VMitD) with the primary endpoints being safety and efficacy was performed. Methods Twenty subjects were enrolled this study, and the dose of Lipo‐MIT was designed to be 12, 16, and 20 mg/m2 at Day 1 combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone. Results The most common grade 3/4 non‐hematologic adverse event was pneumonia (20%). The most frequently observed grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity included thrombocytopenia (70%), neutropenia (55%), lymphopenia (30%), and anemia (10%). Fifteen subjects received at least one efficacy evaluation, including 60% (9/15) with a very good partial response (VGPR) or better, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR) of 86.7% (13/15). Conclusions This is the first report about the novel triplet regimen VMitD, including Lipo‐MIT for RRMM, which was well tolerated and demonstrated efficacy. Further studies are required to assess the outcomes more accurately and to evaluate its effectiveness in comparison to other salvage regimens containing proteasome inhibitors and anthracyclines. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05052970
Bibliography:This work was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 82100169). In addition, this study was sponsored by CSPC Zhongnuo Pharmaceutical (Shijiazhuang) Co. Ltd. The funder provided investigational drugs but had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, manuscript preparation, or the decision to submit for publication.
Funding
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Funding: This work was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 82100169). In addition, this study was sponsored by CSPC Zhongnuo Pharmaceutical (Shijiazhuang) Co. Ltd. The funder provided investigational drugs but had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, manuscript preparation, or the decision to submit for publication.
ISSN:2045-7634
2045-7634
DOI:10.1002/cam4.70890