Do Time-Dependent Repeated Measures of Anthropometric and Body Composition Indices Improve the Prediction of Incident Diabetes in the Cohort Study? Findings from a Community-Based Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study

Background: Cumulative evidence consistently shows that anthropometric and body composition measurements are strongly linked to the risk of incident diabetes, typically based on baseline measurements. This study aims to assess whether repeated measurements enhance the prediction of diabetes risk bey...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetes & metabolism journal Vol. 49; no. 2; pp. 275 - 285
Main Authors Lee, Hye Ah, Park, Hyesook, Park, Bomi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Korean Diabetes Association / Daehan Dangnyobyeong Hakoe 01.03.2025
Korean Diabetes Association
대한당뇨병학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2233-6079
2233-6087
2233-6087
DOI10.4093/dmj.2024.0357

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Cumulative evidence consistently shows that anthropometric and body composition measurements are strongly linked to the risk of incident diabetes, typically based on baseline measurements. This study aims to assess whether repeated measurements enhance the prediction of diabetes risk beyond baseline assessments alone.Methods: We utilized data from a 16-year population-based follow-up cohort within the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study, comprising 6,030 individuals aged 40 to 69 years at baseline. We included eight indices: a body shape index (ABSI), body adiposity index (BAI), waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), weight-adjusted skeletal muscle index (SMI), percent body fat, and fat-to-muscle ratio. The effect of these measurements for incident diabetes was estimated using Harrell’s C-indexes and hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals, employing time-dependent Cox proportional hazard models.Results: Over the 16-year follow-up, 939 new diabetes cases were identified (cumulative incidence, 15.6%). The median number of indicator measurements per participant was eight. The basic model, including 10 features (sex, age, education levels, physical activity, alcohol intake, current smoking, total energy intake, dietary diversity score, and log-transformed C-reactive protein levels, and quartiles of unweighted genetic risk score at baseline), yielded a Harrell’s C-index of 0.610. The highest C-index in repeated measurements was for WC (0.668) across the general population, weight-adjusted SMI in men, and WHR in women. However, except for ABSI and BAI, the diabetes predictive power of the other indicators was comparable. Additionally, repeated measurements of WC, BMI, and WHR in women were found to contribute to improved discrimination compared to baseline measurements, but not in men.Conclusion: Utilizing repeated measurements of general and central adiposity to predict diabetes may be helpful in predicting hidden risks, especially in women.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
https://e-dmj.org/journal/view.php?number=2895
ISSN:2233-6079
2233-6087
2233-6087
DOI:10.4093/dmj.2024.0357