Comparison of anterior segment optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy for assessment of the anterior segment

Purpose To compare anterior segment parameters using quantitative imaging by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Setting Tertiary-care glaucoma research center. Methods Sixty-three eyes of 63 subjects had anterior segment evaluation by AS-OCT (V...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cataract and refractive surgery Vol. 33; no. 5; pp. 837 - 840
Main Authors Dada, Tanuj, MD, Sihota, Ramanjit, MD, FRCS, Gadia, Ritu, MD, DNB, Aggarwal, Anand, MD, Mandal, Subrata, MD, DNB, Gupta, Viney, MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.05.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To compare anterior segment parameters using quantitative imaging by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Setting Tertiary-care glaucoma research center. Methods Sixty-three eyes of 63 subjects had anterior segment evaluation by AS-OCT (Visante-Zeiss) and UBM (Paradigm). Central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD) (measured from the central corneal endothelium to the anterior lens capsule), and the peripheral iridocorneal angles (temporal and nasal) were assessed and compared. Results There was an excellent correlation between AS-OCT and UBM measurements for the nasal angle ( r = 0.84; P <.0001), temporal angle ( r = 0.86; P <.0001), ACD ( r = 0.97; P <.0001), and CCT ( r = 0.91; P <.0001). There was no significant difference (paired t test) between the mean ACD, CCT, and angle parameters measured by AS-OCT or UBM. The mean values of the parameters measured by AS-OCT and UBM were, respectively, as follows: nasal angle, 26.25 degrees ± 11.0 (SD) and 28.27 ± 11.3 degrees ( P = .3); temporal angle, 25.1 ± 11.4 degrees and 28.3 ± 13.5 degrees ( P = .15); ACD, 2.85 ± 0.5 mm and 2.78 ± 0.5 mm ( P = .2); and CCT, 512 ± 46 μm and 502 ± 46 μm ( P = .25). The AS-OCT images showed sharper definition of the scleral spur than the UBM images. Conclusion Anterior segment optical coherence tomography and UBM can both be used for anterior segment measurements and yielded comparable results.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0886-3350
1873-4502
DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.01.021