Test-retest Reproducibility of Optic Disk Deterioration Detected From Stereophotographs by Masked Graders

• Published in: American journal of ophthalmology Vol. 140; no. 4; pp. 762 - 764
• Main Authors: Parrish, Richard K., Schiffman, Joyce C., Feuer, William J., Anderson, Douglas R., Budenz, Donald L., Wells-Albornoz, Maria-Cristina, Vandenbroucke, Ruth, Kass, Michael A., Gordon, Mae O.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.10.2005; Elsevier; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Agreements; Biological and medical sciences; Confidence intervals; Glaucoma; Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis; Humans; Hypertension; Medical personnel; Medical sciences; Miscellaneous; Ocular Hypertension - diagnosis; Ophthalmology; Optic Disk - pathology; Optic Nerve Diseases - diagnosis; Photography - methods; Quality control; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Mask; Ophthalmology; Optic papilla; Test; Reproducibility
• ISSN: 0002-9394; 1879-1891
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.04.044

To assess the reproducibility of determining whether an eye has developed optic disk deterioration by the Optic Disc Reading Center (ODRC) in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Test-retest reproducibility study. Masked, certified graders at the ODRC determine the occurrence of optic disk deterioration in OHTS by comparing baseline with follow-up stereoscopic optic disk photographs. To assess reproducibility, regradings were obtained annually by inserting masked “quality control” photographs into the usual ODRC reading stream. Agreement (kappa) ranged from 0.65 to 0.83 over 5 years. Specificity ranged from 98% to 100%, and sensitivity ranged from 64% to 81%. The kappa statistic for test-retest agreement in OHTS is in the range considered good to excellent over 5 years. Consistency (specificity) in regrading optic disks that did not develop deterioration was particularly high. The sensitivity results show that detecting subtle deterioration of optic disks is challenging.