Keratoconus tomographic indices in osteogenesis imperfecta

• Published in: Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology Vol. 261; no. 9; pp. 2585 - 2592
• Main Authors: Correia Barão, Rafael, Santos, Miguel, Marques, Raquel Esteves, Quintas, Ana Miguel, Guerra, Paulo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.09.2023; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Asymmetry; Cornea; Eye diseases; Hereditary diseases; Keratoconus; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Ophthalmology; Osteogenesis; Osteogenesis imperfecta; Keratoconus; Collagen; Corneal tomography; Osteogenesis
• ISSN: 0721-832X; 1435-702X; 1435-702X
• DOI: 10.1007/s00417-023-06059-4

Purpose Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare inherited disease affecting collagen-rich tissues. Ocular complications have been reported such as thin corneas, low ocular rigidity, keratoconus, among others. The purpose of this study is to characterize corneal tomographic features in OI patients compared to unaffected patients, with particular focus on commonly studied keratoconus indices. Methods Cross-sectional case–control study including 37 OI patients and 37 age-matched controls. Patients and controls underwent comprehensive ophthalmological examination including corneal Scheimpflug tomography with a Pentacam HR device (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) to analyse and compare topometric, tomographic, pachymetric and Belin-Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display III (BAD-D) data of both eyes of each patient. Results Most OI patients had type I disease ( n  = 24; 65%) but type III–VII patients were also included. Two patients had clinically overt bilateral keratoconus. OI patients had significantly higher maximum keratometry (45.2 ± 2.1 vs. 43.7 ± 1.2; p  = 0.0416), front and back elevation (3.0 ± 3.3 vs. 2.1 ± 1.3, p = 0.0201; 11.1 ± 8.2 vs. 5.0 ± 3.7, p  < 0.0001), index of surface variance (25.5 ± 13 vs. 17.4 ± 8.3; p  = 0.0016), index of vertical asymmetry (0.21 ± 0.14 vs. 0.15 ± 0.06; p  = 0.0215), index of height asymmetry (9.2 ± 14 vs. 6.0 ± 4.5; p  = 0.0421), index of height decentration (0.02 ± 0.01 vs. 0.01 ± 0.01; p  < 0.0001) and average pachymetric progression (1.01 ± 0.19 vs. 0.88 ± 0.14; p  < 0.0001) readings. Thinnest corneal thickness and maximum Ambrósio relational thickness were significantly lower (477 ± 52 vs. 543 ± 26; 387 ± 95 vs. 509 ± 49; p  < 0.0001). Two-thirds of OI patients had corneas with a minimum thickness < 500 µm. BAD-D value was significantly higher in OI patients (2.1 ± 1.4 vs. 0.9 ± 0.2; p  < 0.0001). Conclusion OI patients showed significant changes in corneal profiles compared with healthy subjects. A high proportion of patients had tomographically suspect corneas when using keratoconus diagnostic indices. Further studies are warranted to assess the true risk of corneal ectasia in OI patients.