Stimulus-response complexity influences task-set inhibition in task switching

Previous studies have found that inhibiting a task set plays an important role in task switching. However, the impact of stimulus-response (S-R) complexity on this inhibition processing has not been explored. In this study, we applied the backward inhibition paradigm (switching between tasks A, B, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPeerJ (San Francisco, CA) Vol. 9; p. e10988
Main Authors Zhao, Li, Hu, Saisai, Xia, Yingying, Li, Jinyu, Zhao, Jingjing, Li, Ya, Wang, Yonghui
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States PeerJ, Inc 30.03.2021
PeerJ Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Previous studies have found that inhibiting a task set plays an important role in task switching. However, the impact of stimulus-response (S-R) complexity on this inhibition processing has not been explored. In this study, we applied the backward inhibition paradigm (switching between tasks A, B, and C, presented in sets of three) in order to investigate inhibition performance under different S-R complexities caused by corresponding S-R mappings. The results showed that the difficult condition resulted in a greater switch cost than the moderate and easy conditions. Furthermore, we found a significant 2 repetition cost under the easy S-R complexity that was reversed under the difficult S-R complexity. To verify stability of the reversed 2 repetition cost in the difficult condition, we recruited another independent sample to conduct an additional experiment with the difficult condition. These results replicated the reversed -2 repetition cost. These findings suggest that S-R complexity affects task-set inhibition in task switching because the effect of the task-set inhibition was insignificant when the S-R complexity increased; it was only significant under the easy condition. This result was caused by the different cognitive resource assignments.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2167-8359
2167-8359
DOI:10.7717/peerj.10988