Quantification of measurable residual disease using duplex sequencing in adults with acute myeloid leukemia
The presence of measurable residual disease (MRD) is strongly associated with treatment outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Despite the correlation with clinical outcomes, MRD assessment has yet to be standardized or routinely incorporated into clinical trials and discrepancies have been obser...
Saved in:
Published in | Haematologica (Roma) Vol. 109; no. 2; pp. 401 - 410 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Italy
Fondazione Ferrata Storti
01.02.2024
Ferrata Storti Foundation |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The presence of measurable residual disease (MRD) is strongly associated with treatment outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Despite the correlation with clinical outcomes, MRD assessment has yet to be standardized or routinely incorporated into clinical trials and discrepancies have been observed between different techniques for MRD assessment. In 62 patients with AML, aged 18-60 years, in first complete remission after intensive induction therapy on the randomized phase III SWOG-S0106 clinical trial (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT00085709), MRD detection by centralized, high-quality multiparametric flow cytometry was compared with a 29-gene panel utilizing duplex sequencing (DS), an ultrasensitive next-generation sequencing method that generates double-stranded consensus sequences to reduce false positive errors. MRD as defined by DS was observed in 22 (35%) patients and was strongly associated with higher rates of relapse (68% vs. 13%; hazard ratio [HR] =8.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2-24.5; P<0.001) and decreased survival (32% vs. 82%; HR=5.6; 95% CI: 2.3-13.8; P<0.001) at 5 years. DS MRD strongly outperformed multiparametric flow cytometry MRD, which was observed in ten (16%) patients and marginally associated with higher rates of relapse (50% vs. 30%; HR=2.4; 95% CI: 0.9-6.7; P=0.087) and decreased survival (40% vs. 68%; HR=2.5; 95% CI: 1.0-6.3; P=0.059) at 5 years. Furthermore, the prognostic significance of DS MRD status at the time of remission for subsequent relapse was similar on both randomized arms of the trial. These findings suggest that next-generation sequencing-based AML MRD testing is a powerful tool that could be developed for use in patient management and for early anti-leukemic treatment assessment in clinical trials. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Disclosures The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute receives research funding for the laboratory of CSH from the Foundation of the NIH AML MRD Biomarkers Consortium. MO consults for Merck and Biosight and serves on the data safety monitoring committee for Celgene, Glycomimetic, and Grifols. JH, THS, CCV, ES and JJS are employees and stockholders of TwinStrand Biosciences. BLW consults for Amgen and Kite Pharma. HPE discloses grants and other support from AbbVie, Agios Pharmaceuticals, ALX Oncology, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Gilead Sciences, GlycoMimetics, ImmunoGen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, MacroGenics, Novartis and PTC Therapeutics; has received research funding from AbbVie, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Incyte Corporation, Jazz Pharmaceuticals and Novartis; is part of the speakers bureau of AbbVie; is on the independent review committee of AbbVie, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, GlycoMimetics, Incyte Corporation, Jazz Pharmaceuticals and Kura Oncology. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Contributions Raw FASTQ files are available in the NCBI Small Reads Archive (accession: PRJNA945188). JPR conceived and designed the study. JH and ES performed and analyzed laboratory experiments. LB managed clinical samples. THS and CCV performed bioinformatic analysis. HN and MO performed statistical analysis. BLW performed flow cytometry analysis. HPE chaired the clinical trial. LWD performed genetic variant interpretation. LWD and CSH directed integrative analysis and wrote the original version of the manuscript. All authors contributed to reviewing and editing the manuscript and are accountable for the final version. Data-sharing statement |
ISSN: | 0390-6078 1592-8721 1592-8721 |
DOI: | 10.3324/haematol.2023.283520 |