Comparison of diagnostic accuracy measures of novel 3D quantitative coronary angiography based software and diastolic pressure ratio for fractional flow Reserve. A single center pooled analysis of FAST EXTEND and FAST II studies

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature Vol. 39; p. 100986
Main Authors Scoccia, Alessandra, Neleman, Tara, Tomaniak, Mariusz, Masdjedi, Kaneshka, Groenland, Frederik T.W., Kardys, Isabella, M.R. Ligthart, Jurgen, Van Mieghem, Nicolas M., Spitzer, Ernest, Daemen, Joost
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.04.2022
Elsevier
Subjects
Coronary physiology
Correspondence
dPR
FFR
Fractional flow reserve
NHPR
QCA
Quantitative coronary angiography
vFFR
CI
dPR
vFFR
Fractional flow reserve
QCA
NST-ACS
AUC
CCS
Coronary physiology
FFR
iFR
PCI
NHPR
Quantitative coronary angiography
Pd/Pa
QFR
NHPR, non-hyperemic pressure ratios
PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention
iFR, instantaneous wave–free ratio
CI, confidence interval
AUC, area under the curve
FFR, fractional flow reserve
Pd/Pa, distal coronary pressure/ aortic pressure
CCS, chronic coronary syndrome
NST-ACS, non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome
QFR, quantitative flow ratio
dPR, diastolic Pressure Ratio
vFFR, vessel fractional flow reserve
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2352-9067
2352-9067
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.100986