Effectiveness of a Stigma Awareness Intervention on Reemployment of People with Mental Health Issues/Mental Illness: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial

• Published in: Journal of occupational rehabilitation Vol. 34; no. 1; pp. 87 - 99
• Main Authors: Janssens, K. M. E., Joosen, M. C. W., Henderson, C., Bakker, M., den Hollander, W., van Weeghel, J., Brouwers, E. P. M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.03.2024; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Clinical Psychology; Clusters; Effectiveness; Employment; Environmental Health; Health Psychology; Humans; Illnesses; Intervention; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Mental disorders; Mental Disorders - psychology; Mental Disorders - therapy; Mental Health; Occupational health; Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine; Orthopedics; Randomization; Rehabilitation; Social Stigma; Stigma; Workplace; Discrimination; Mental health issues; Employment rates; Stigma; Mental illness
• ISSN: 1053-0487; 1573-3688
• DOI: 10.1007/s10926-023-10129-z

Purpose A barrier for reemployment of people with mental health issues/mental illness (MHI) is workplace stigma and discrimination. In this RCT the effectiveness of a stigma-awareness intervention addressing finding work, retaining work and decisional stress were evaluated. Methods A cluster RCT was conducted in 8 Dutch municipal practices. Randomisation took place at practice level. Participants were unemployed people with MHI, receiving social benefits. The intervention consisted of a decision aid for workplace disclosure for participants and a 2 × 3 h stigma-awareness training for their employment specialists. Primary outcomes were measured at baseline, 3-, 6- and 12-months. Multilevel analyses, containing random intercepts of participants nested in organizations, were conducted to analyse the effects of the intervention. Results Participants (N = 153) were randomized to an experimental (n = 76) or control group (n = 77). At six months, significantly more participants of the experimental group (51%) had found work compared to the control group (26%). At twelve months, significantly more participants of the experimental group (49%) had retained work compared to the control group (23%). Intention-to-treat analyses showed that randomization to the experimental group was associated with finding (OR(95%CI) = 7.78(1.33–45.53), p = 0.02) and retaining (OR(95%CI) = 12.15(2.81–52.63), p < 0.01) work more often at twelve months. Analyses showed that the experimental and control group did not differ in decisional stress. Conclusions Our stigma awareness intervention was effective for finding and retaining work. As the percentage of people who found and retained work almost doubled, this suggests that on a societal level, a vast number of unemployed people could be reemployed with a relatively simple intervention. Trial Registration The study was retrospectively registered at the Dutch Trial Register (TRN: NL7798, date: 04-06-2019).