Common myna roosts are not recruitment centres

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 9; no. 8; p. e103406
• Main Authors: Sarangi, Manaswini, Ganguly, Payel, Zenia, Arvind, Chiti, Lakshman, Abhilash, Vidya, T N C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 14.08.2014; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Acridotheres tristis; Animal behavior; Animals; Behavior, Animal - physiology; Biology and Life Sciences; Birds; Birds - physiology; Breeding; Consolidation; Ecology and Environmental Sciences; Evening; Feeding; Food; Forage; Forages; Foraging behavior; Group size; Hypotheses; Information transfer; Morning; Nehru, Jawaharlal (1889-1964); Organismal biology; Phylogenetics; Population studies; Predation; Predators; Recruitment; Roosts; Social Behavior; Starlings - physiology; Sunrise; Sunset; Tactics; Vigilance; India
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103406

We studied communal roosting in the Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis) in the light of the recruitment centre hypothesis and predation at the roost. The number and sizes of flocks departing from and arriving at focal roosts were recorded over a two year period. We also recorded the sizes and behaviour of foraging flocks. We found that flock sizes of birds departing from roosts at sunrise were larger than those at the feeding site, suggesting that there was no recruitment from the roosts. Flocks entering the roosts during sunset were larger on average than those leaving the following sunrise, suggesting no consolidation of flocks in the morning. Flocks entering the roosts at sunset were also larger on average than those that had left that sunrise, although there was no recruitment at the feeding site. There was no effect of group size on the proportion of time spent feeding. Contrary to expectation, single birds showed lower apparent vigilance than birds that foraged in pairs or groups, possibly due to scrounging tactics being used in the presence of feeding companions. Thus, the recruitment centre hypothesis did not hold in our study population of mynas. Predation at dawn and dusk were also not important to communal roosting: predators near the roosts did not result in larger flocks, and resulted in larger durations of arrival/departure contrary to expectation. Since flock sizes were smallest at the feeding site and larger in the evening than in the morning, but did not coincide with predator activity, information transfer unrelated to food (such as breeding opportunities) may possibly give rise to the evening aggregations.